Tough Calls: Shared Priorities and Sector-Specific Decision-Making Challenges Among Senior Leaders in Norway's Emergency Services

This study examines how senior leaders from Norway's police, military, and fire/rescue services perceive factors that hinder effective decision-making during crises. A total of 203 leaders participated in a simulated national emergency exercise conducted at headquarters level. Guided by Yates, Veinott and Patalano's theoretical framework, participants evaluated the influence of seven predefined difficulty categories and ranked them according to their perceived impact on operational decisions. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis tests to compare perceptions across sector affiliation and years of working experience. Findings reveal notable differences among groups, with outcome significance and situational clarity emerging as the most influential factors. Leaders with more years of working experience reported lower process-related difficulty, with these decision-making challenges peaking at mid-career stages rather than declining linearly. Operational factors (outcomes, possibilities, options) consistently outweighed value-based or procedural considerations. The study makes an important contribution to strengthen decision-making frameworks for operational teams and underscore the leadership challenges inherent in collaborative crisis response highlighting the need for tailored training and interagency adaptations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02807270261463554
Primary Topic
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Tough Calls: Shared Priorities and Sector-Specific Decision-Making Challenges Among Senior Leaders in Norway's Emergency Services

Gabriela Bjørnsen, Jostein Mattingsdal
International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
article

Tough Calls: Shared Priorities and Sector-Specific Decision-Making Challenges Among Senior Leaders in Norway's Emergency Services

Gabriela Bjørnsen, Jostein Mattingsdal
article en

Abstract

This study examines how senior leaders from Norway's police, military, and fire/rescue services perceive factors that hinder effective decision-making during crises. A total of 203 leaders participated in a simulated national emergency exercise conducted at headquarters level. Guided by Yates, Veinott and Patalano's theoretical framework, participants evaluated the influence of seven predefined difficulty categories and ranked them according to their perceived impact on operational decisions. Data were analyzed using ANOVA and Kruskal–Wallis tests to compare perceptions across sector affiliation and years of working experience. Findings reveal notable differences among groups, with outcome significance and situational clarity emerging as the most influential factors. Leaders with more years of working experience reported lower process-related difficulty, with these decision-making challenges peaking at mid-career stages rather than declining linearly. Operational factors (outcomes, possibilities, options) consistently outweighed value-based or procedural considerations. The study makes an important contribution to strengthen decision-making frameworks for operational teams and underscore the leadership challenges inherent in collaborative crisis response highlighting the need for tailored training and interagency adaptations.

International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters
International Rescue Committee (ET), Norwegian Defence University College (NO)
Forsvaret
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.