Quantifying the effects of return flows from spray irrigation in a regional model

Regional groundwater models are the standard method in England for assessing impacts of abstractions on environmental receptors. Whilst these models account for numerous natural and anthropogenic processes, the application of spray irrigation to crop-growing areas has been omitted. Using the North East Anglian Chalk (NEAC) groundwater model, the effects of including spray irrigation as additional rainfall to arable areas is investigated. Under a fully licensed scenario, increased evapotranspiration accounts for approximately 60% of the assigned spray irrigation volume, with increased recharge equivalent to 28% of the total and smaller increases in interflow (9%) and runoff (3%). The majority of this additional recharge occurs between October and December, after the main April to September period for spray irrigation, highlighting the effects of wetter soils that encourage greater infiltration of winter rainfall. Overall, modelled compliance to environmental flow metrics is improved under both Q50 and Q97 conditions, indicating greater availability of water and highlighting the importance of modelling all elements of the water balance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1144/qjegh2026-027
Primary Topic
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying the effects of return flows from spray irrigation in a regional model

M.T. Graham
Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
article

Quantifying the effects of return flows from spray irrigation in a regional model

M.T. Graham
article en

Abstract

Regional groundwater models are the standard method in England for assessing impacts of abstractions on environmental receptors. Whilst these models account for numerous natural and anthropogenic processes, the application of spray irrigation to crop-growing areas has been omitted. Using the North East Anglian Chalk (NEAC) groundwater model, the effects of including spray irrigation as additional rainfall to arable areas is investigated. Under a fully licensed scenario, increased evapotranspiration accounts for approximately 60% of the assigned spray irrigation volume, with increased recharge equivalent to 28% of the total and smaller increases in interflow (9%) and runoff (3%). The majority of this additional recharge occurs between October and December, after the main April to September period for spray irrigation, highlighting the effects of wetter soils that encourage greater infiltration of winter rainfall. Overall, modelled compliance to environmental flow metrics is improved under both Q50 and Q97 conditions, indicating greater availability of water and highlighting the importance of modelling all elements of the water balance.

Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology
Mott MacDonald (United Kingdom) (GB)
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Soil and Unsaturated Flow
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantifying the effects of return flows from spray irrigation in a regional model — M.T. Graham · Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS