A Graph‐Based Generative Artificial Intelligence Methodology for Autocorrection of Utility‐System P&IDs

ABSTRACT Piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) are central engineering documents whose review remains largely manual, time‐consuming and error‐prone. We investigate generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) for P&ID revision. Specifically, we interpret P&ID correction as a machine translation task. Machine‐readable DEXPI P&IDs are converted with pyDEXPI into attributed graphs, and corrected topologies are represented as generalized SFILES sequences (GGILES). Based on this representation, we adapt a transformer‐based Graph‐to‐SFILES model to utility‐system P&IDs and train it on a synthetic dataset of paired erroneous and corrected diagrams. On this benchmark, the model achieves high accuracy and learns attribute‐dependent error patterns. Tests on five industrial DEXPI P&IDs reveal a gap between synthetic and industrial data, highlighting limitations in data availability and coverage.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Chemie Ingenieur Technik
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.70135
Primary Topic
Advanced Graph Neural Networks
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Graph‐Based Generative Artificial Intelligence Methodology for Autocorrection of Utility‐System P&IDs

Dominik P. Goldstein, Artur M. Schweidtmann, Lukas Schulze Balhorn, Ge H. M. Driessen et al.
Chemie Ingenieur Technik
Advanced Graph Neural Networks
article

A Graph‐Based Generative Artificial Intelligence Methodology for Autocorrection of Utility‐System P&IDs

Dominik P. Goldstein, Artur M. Schweidtmann, Lukas Schulze Balhorn, Ge H. M. Driessen, Niels Seijsener, Kevin Dao
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Piping and instrumentation diagrams (P&IDs) are central engineering documents whose review remains largely manual, time‐consuming and error‐prone. We investigate generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) for P&ID revision. Specifically, we interpret P&ID correction as a machine translation task. Machine‐readable DEXPI P&IDs are converted with pyDEXPI into attributed graphs, and corrected topologies are represented as generalized SFILES sequences (GGILES). Based on this representation, we adapt a transformer‐based Graph‐to‐SFILES model to utility‐system P&IDs and train it on a synthetic dataset of paired erroneous and corrected diagrams. On this benchmark, the model achieves high accuracy and learns attribute‐dependent error patterns. Tests on five industrial DEXPI P&IDs reveal a gap between synthetic and industrial data, highlighting limitations in data availability and coverage.

Chemie Ingenieur Technik
Fluor (United States) (US), Amsterdam UMC Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Delft University of Technology (NL)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Advanced Graph Neural Networks
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.