The Invisible Barrier: A Scoping Review of Stigma and Nursing Attitudes in Chemsex Care

Background: Chemsex, or sexualized drug use, exists along a continuum ranging from non-problematic, consensual recreational practice across diverse populations to problematic behaviors linked with clinical vulnerabilities, substance dependence, or compulsive disorders. Within nursing practice, understanding this spectrum is essential to mitigate healthcare-related stigma. Objective: To map and synthesize evidence on stigma and attitudes among nurses regarding chemsex, identifying implications for practice and research. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were performed across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE, and LILACS. Studies involving nurses or healthcare teams focused on stigma, attitudes, or related constructs in chemsex care were included. Data underwent descriptive and thematic synthesis. Results: Six studies met the inclusion criteria, showing substantial heterogeneity. Only one focused exclusively on nurses. Stigma and attitudes were rarely assessed explicitly, emerging instead as underlying factors influencing clinical practice, communication, and patient engagement. Key themes included the necessity for non-judgmental care, significant gaps in knowledge and training, variability in clinical practice, and the impact of organizational barriers. A schematic representation was developed to illustrate the interrelationships between stigma, knowledge, professional attitudes, and structural factors influencing healthcare practice. Conclusions: This review positions stigma as a central mechanism influencing nursing care in chemsex contexts. The findings underscore critical gaps in nursing-specific evidence and emphasize the need for targeted training, validated measurement tools, and integrated care models. Strengthening stigma-informed, patient-centered approaches is essential to improve care delivery and health outcomes for this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing Reports
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/nursrep16070227
Primary Topic
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Invisible Barrier: A Scoping Review of Stigma and Nursing Attitudes in Chemsex Care

Anderson Reis de Sousa, I Fronteira, Álvaro Francisco Lopes de Sousa, Liliane Moretti Carneiro et al.
Nursing Reports
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
article

The Invisible Barrier: A Scoping Review of Stigma and Nursing Attitudes in Chemsex Care

Anderson Reis de Sousa, I Fronteira, Álvaro Francisco Lopes de Sousa, Liliane Moretti Carneiro, Carla Aparecida Arena Ventura, Alice Silva Costa, Hérica Emília Félix de Carvalho, Vinicius de Lima Lovadini, Emerson Lucas Silva Camargo
article en

Abstract

Background: Chemsex, or sexualized drug use, exists along a continuum ranging from non-problematic, consensual recreational practice across diverse populations to problematic behaviors linked with clinical vulnerabilities, substance dependence, or compulsive disorders. Within nursing practice, understanding this spectrum is essential to mitigate healthcare-related stigma. Objective: To map and synthesize evidence on stigma and attitudes among nurses regarding chemsex, identifying implications for practice and research. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Searches were performed across PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, EMBASE, and LILACS. Studies involving nurses or healthcare teams focused on stigma, attitudes, or related constructs in chemsex care were included. Data underwent descriptive and thematic synthesis. Results: Six studies met the inclusion criteria, showing substantial heterogeneity. Only one focused exclusively on nurses. Stigma and attitudes were rarely assessed explicitly, emerging instead as underlying factors influencing clinical practice, communication, and patient engagement. Key themes included the necessity for non-judgmental care, significant gaps in knowledge and training, variability in clinical practice, and the impact of organizational barriers. A schematic representation was developed to illustrate the interrelationships between stigma, knowledge, professional attitudes, and structural factors influencing healthcare practice. Conclusions: This review positions stigma as a central mechanism influencing nursing care in chemsex contexts. The findings underscore critical gaps in nursing-specific evidence and emphasize the need for targeted training, validated measurement tools, and integrated care models. Strengthening stigma-informed, patient-centered approaches is essential to improve care delivery and health outcomes for this population.

Nursing ReportsVol. 16(7)
Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul (BR), Universidade Federal da Bahia (BR), Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Universidade Federal de Alfenas (BR), Universidade Brasil (BR), National School of Public Health (GR), Universidade Estadual do Maranhão (BR)
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Forensic Toxicology and Drug Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.