Polyrhythm Perception and Production: A Scoping Review

In music, rhythms can range from simple isochrony to complex polyrhythms, in which multiple nonharmonically related metrical hierarchies are superimposed (e.g., 2:3, 4:5). This scoping review synthesizes 64 studies comprising 96 experiments on polyrhythm perception and production. Over the past decades, research has shown that factors such as polyrhythm ratio, tempo, sensory modality, and musical training shape how we perceive and produce polyrhythms. Although most reviewed studies lack subjective measurements of polyrhythm complexity, behavioral tasks suggest that ratio sum (e.g., five in 2:3) and the Farey tree offer rough complexity estimates. While tempo affects which periodicity is perceived as the underlying beat, these effects are limited by the preference for binary subdivision grouping. Finally, the reviewed literature suggests that polyrhythms are more often perceived as integrated patterns than segregated streams. For future research, we recommend defining polyrhythms as the superposition of two or more nonharmonically related pulses that share a common cycle, and adding a clear description of whether these pulses are isochronous stimuli or perceived beats extracted from nonisochronous stimuli. Combining behavioral and subjective measures across different polyrhythmic contexts could clarify subjective complexity and under which circumstances polyrhythms are perceived and produced as integrated rhythms or segregated pulses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.70330
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Music Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Polyrhythm Perception and Production: A Scoping Review

Patti Nijhuis, Joshua S. Bamford, Jan Stupacher, Cecilie Møller
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Neuroscience and Music Perception
article

Polyrhythm Perception and Production: A Scoping Review

Patti Nijhuis, Joshua S. Bamford, Jan Stupacher, Cecilie Møller
article en

Abstract

In music, rhythms can range from simple isochrony to complex polyrhythms, in which multiple nonharmonically related metrical hierarchies are superimposed (e.g., 2:3, 4:5). This scoping review synthesizes 64 studies comprising 96 experiments on polyrhythm perception and production. Over the past decades, research has shown that factors such as polyrhythm ratio, tempo, sensory modality, and musical training shape how we perceive and produce polyrhythms. Although most reviewed studies lack subjective measurements of polyrhythm complexity, behavioral tasks suggest that ratio sum (e.g., five in 2:3) and the Farey tree offer rough complexity estimates. While tempo affects which periodicity is perceived as the underlying beat, these effects are limited by the preference for binary subdivision grouping. Finally, the reviewed literature suggests that polyrhythms are more often perceived as integrated patterns than segregated streams. For future research, we recommend defining polyrhythms as the superposition of two or more nonharmonically related pulses that share a common cycle, and adding a clear description of whether these pulses are isochronous stimuli or perceived beats extracted from nonisochronous stimuli. Combining behavioral and subjective measures across different polyrhythmic contexts could clarify subjective complexity and under which circumstances polyrhythms are perceived and produced as integrated rhythms or segregated pulses.

Annals of the New York Academy of SciencesVol. 1561(1)
Aarhus University (DK), Royal Academy of Music (DK), Museum of the History of Science (GB), University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Danmarks Grundforskningsfond, Lundbeckfonden
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Neuroscience and Music Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.