Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Carbon Balance Considering Multi‐Dimensional Urbanization Across 366 Cities in China

Abstract Low‐carbon sustainable development has become essential for China to achieve its carbon neutrality goals. However, most existing carbon balance (CB) studies overlook carbon quota allocation that reflects development needs during urbanization, leading to assessments of urban low‐carbon development that may lack scientific rigour and fairness. This study integrates the three dimensions of economic urbanization, population urbanization, and spatial urbanization to construct a multi‐dimensional urban modified carbon balance (MCB) assessment framework and systematically calculates the CB and MCB of 366 cities in China. The results show that over the past 20 years, the gap between anthropogenic carbon emissions and ecological sequestration has continued to widen. Urban areas, accounting for the majority of emissions, exhibited an average annual emission growth rate of 15.4%, which contrasts sharply with the mere 1% average annual expansion observed in natural carbon sequestration capacity. The number of cities achieving CB decreased from 146 to 64. In addition, urban carbon quota demand was significantly correlated with multi‐dimensional urbanization levels. Under a carbon quota allocation mechanism that incorporates compensatory regulation, the number of cities meeting the MCB standard will increase significantly from 207 to 231. This study provides a fairer reference for assessing low‐carbon development in cities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth s Future
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025ef007265
Primary Topic
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Carbon Balance Considering Multi‐Dimensional Urbanization Across 366 Cities in China

Orhan Altan, Tengping Jiang, Daohong Gong, Yuliang Deng et al.
Earth s Future
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
article

Spatiotemporal Dynamics of Carbon Balance Considering Multi‐Dimensional Urbanization Across 366 Cities in China

Orhan Altan, Tengping Jiang, Daohong Gong, Yuliang Deng, Min Huang, Changjiang Xiao, Daoye Zhu, Hui Lin, Yong Ge
article en

Abstract

Abstract Low‐carbon sustainable development has become essential for China to achieve its carbon neutrality goals. However, most existing carbon balance (CB) studies overlook carbon quota allocation that reflects development needs during urbanization, leading to assessments of urban low‐carbon development that may lack scientific rigour and fairness. This study integrates the three dimensions of economic urbanization, population urbanization, and spatial urbanization to construct a multi‐dimensional urban modified carbon balance (MCB) assessment framework and systematically calculates the CB and MCB of 366 cities in China. The results show that over the past 20 years, the gap between anthropogenic carbon emissions and ecological sequestration has continued to widen. Urban areas, accounting for the majority of emissions, exhibited an average annual emission growth rate of 15.4%, which contrasts sharply with the mere 1% average annual expansion observed in natural carbon sequestration capacity. The number of cities achieving CB decreased from 146 to 64. In addition, urban carbon quota demand was significantly correlated with multi‐dimensional urbanization levels. Under a carbon quota allocation mechanism that incorporates compensatory regulation, the number of cities meeting the MCB standard will increase significantly from 207 to 231. This study provides a fairer reference for assessing low‐carbon development in cities.

Earth s FutureVol. 14(7)
Tongji University (CN), Nanjing Normal University (CN), Hohai University (CN), Istanbul Technical University (TR), Jiangxi Normal University (CN)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Environmental Impact and Sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.