Evaluation of the Efficacy of Pharmacological Interventions in the Prevention of Acute Mountain Sickness: A Network Meta-Analysis

Acute mountain sickness (AMS) is a common altitude-related condition affecting individuals ascending to high elevations, presenting with headache, nausea, fatigue, and dizziness. Although several pharmacological agents have been proposed for AMS prophylaxis, their comparative effectiveness remains insufficiently established. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Major electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing pharmacological interventions for AMS prophylaxis. Data from 46 eligible studies were extracted using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and analyzed with R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The primary outcome was AMS incidence. Network geometry was mapped using network plots; treatment effects were calculated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs); and interventions were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. Risk of bias was assessed, and certainty of evidence was determined by CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis). The analysis incorporated 46 studies evaluating multiple pharmacological agents. SUCRA rankings identified inhaled budesonide as the most efficacious agent for AMS prevention, followed by acetazolamide and theophylline. Most studies demonstrated low risk of bias. Acetazolamide exhibited narrower CIs, reflecting a more robust and reliable evidence base. CINeMA showed overall moderate certainty of evidence. Inhaled budesonide had the highest probability of being the most effective pharmacological agent for AMS prevention, with acetazolamide and theophylline also demonstrating substantial efficacy. Acetazolamide remains the best-evidenced option. Additional high-quality RCTs are required to consolidate treatment hierarchies and evaluate agents with limited current data.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Cureus
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.111777
Primary Topic
High Altitude and Hypoxia
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Pharmacological Interventions in the Prevention of Acute Mountain Sickness: A Network Meta-Analysis

Meenakshi Meenu, Satyajit Mohapatra, Sukainnya Buragohain, Dibyajyoti Saikia et al.
Cureus
High Altitude and Hypoxia
article

Evaluation of the Efficacy of Pharmacological Interventions in the Prevention of Acute Mountain Sickness: A Network Meta-Analysis

Meenakshi Meenu, Satyajit Mohapatra, Sukainnya Buragohain, Dibyajyoti Saikia, Joonmoni Lahon, Indrani Sarma
article en

Abstract

Acute mountain sickness (AMS) is a common altitude-related condition affecting individuals ascending to high elevations, presenting with headache, nausea, fatigue, and dizziness. Although several pharmacological agents have been proposed for AMS prophylaxis, their comparative effectiveness remains insufficiently established. A systematic review and network meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Major electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing pharmacological interventions for AMS prophylaxis. Data from 46 eligible studies were extracted using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, WA, USA) and analyzed with R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The primary outcome was AMS incidence. Network geometry was mapped using network plots; treatment effects were calculated as odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs); and interventions were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) probabilities. Risk of bias was assessed, and certainty of evidence was determined by CINeMA (Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis). The analysis incorporated 46 studies evaluating multiple pharmacological agents. SUCRA rankings identified inhaled budesonide as the most efficacious agent for AMS prevention, followed by acetazolamide and theophylline. Most studies demonstrated low risk of bias. Acetazolamide exhibited narrower CIs, reflecting a more robust and reliable evidence base. CINeMA showed overall moderate certainty of evidence. Inhaled budesonide had the highest probability of being the most effective pharmacological agent for AMS prevention, with acetazolamide and theophylline also demonstrating substantial efficacy. Acetazolamide remains the best-evidenced option. Additional high-quality RCTs are required to consolidate treatment hierarchies and evaluate agents with limited current data.

Cureus
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
High Altitude and Hypoxia
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.