Experimental comparison of electrochemical and quantum transport-based biodetection methods for RNA cancer biomarkers

Cancer remains a leading cause of death worldwide and early‑stage detection is essential to improve patient outcomes. Recent advances in nanoscale sensing have opened up new pathways for ultrasensitive, label-free detection of nucleic acid biomarkers. In this work, we compare two sensor platforms for a KRAS G12V RNA biomarker: (i) a classical bioelectrochemical sensor that exploits the redox activity of methylene blue modified DNA probes, and (ii) a recently reported quantum transport-based single-molecule sensor that measures conductance changes of individual DNA: RNA hybrids using scanning ‑ tunneling‑microscopy break‑junctions (STM‑BJ). By comparing both approaches, we evaluate their key performance metrics -limit of detection, specificity, and robustness- in biologically relevant complex media. The electrochemical sensor reaches a femtomolar detection limit, but fails to discriminate a single‑base mismatch under the tested conditions. In contrast, the STM-BJ platform delivers attomolar sensitivity and single-base resolution; however, its operation is hindered in complex media, particularly in protein-rich environments. However, this weakness is also shared with the electrochemical approach. Our comparative analysis highlights the complementary strengths of these platforms, suggesting that integrating both could improve point-of-care cancer screening by combining sensitivity, specificity, and robustness in complex samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Chemistry
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5155/eurjchem.17.2.89-98.2748
Primary Topic
Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experimental comparison of electrochemical and quantum transport-based biodetection methods for RNA cancer biomarkers

Keshani Pattiya Arachchillage, Ajoke Williams, Juan M. Artés, Subrata Chandra
European Journal of Chemistry
Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
article

Experimental comparison of electrochemical and quantum transport-based biodetection methods for RNA cancer biomarkers

Keshani Pattiya Arachchillage, Ajoke Williams, Juan M. Artés, Subrata Chandra
article en

Abstract

Cancer remains a leading cause of death worldwide and early‑stage detection is essential to improve patient outcomes. Recent advances in nanoscale sensing have opened up new pathways for ultrasensitive, label-free detection of nucleic acid biomarkers. In this work, we compare two sensor platforms for a KRAS G12V RNA biomarker: (i) a classical bioelectrochemical sensor that exploits the redox activity of methylene blue modified DNA probes, and (ii) a recently reported quantum transport-based single-molecule sensor that measures conductance changes of individual DNA: RNA hybrids using scanning ‑ tunneling‑microscopy break‑junctions (STM‑BJ). By comparing both approaches, we evaluate their key performance metrics -limit of detection, specificity, and robustness- in biologically relevant complex media. The electrochemical sensor reaches a femtomolar detection limit, but fails to discriminate a single‑base mismatch under the tested conditions. In contrast, the STM-BJ platform delivers attomolar sensitivity and single-base resolution; however, its operation is hindered in complex media, particularly in protein-rich environments. However, this weakness is also shared with the electrochemical approach. Our comparative analysis highlights the complementary strengths of these platforms, suggesting that integrating both could improve point-of-care cancer screening by combining sensitivity, specificity, and robustness in complex samples.

European Journal of ChemistryVol. 17(2)
University of Massachusetts Lowell (US), European Research Council (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Electrochemical Analysis and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.