Comprehensive Benchmarking of Secure Computation Technologies for Machine Learning on General Purpose Hardware

The increasing need for privacy in machine learning has driven interest in cryptographic methods that enable computation on sensitive data. Secure multi-party computation and fully-homomorphic encryption are two prominent approaches, but their practical trade-offs are often unclear for real-world use. This work presents a pragmatic benchmark and comparison of these technologies for machine learning inference. Using representative open source frameworks, we evaluate performance across basic operations, distance metrics, regression models, and common deep learning architectures. The evaluation accounts for realistic deployment conditions, including communication overhead and partial plaintext execution. The results show that secure multi-party computation scales well to large and complex models but is strongly affected by network latency, while fully-homomorphic encryption is easier to deploy and performs well for small models and regression tasks. We conclude that the two approaches are complementary rather than competing and provide concrete guidance to help practitioners select the most suitable technology for privacy preserving machine learning in practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Sciences
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/app16136519
Primary Topic
Cryptography and Data Security
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comprehensive Benchmarking of Secure Computation Technologies for Machine Learning on General Purpose Hardware

Thomas Lorünser, Adam Skuta, Marcus Taubert
Applied Sciences
Cryptography and Data Security
article

Comprehensive Benchmarking of Secure Computation Technologies for Machine Learning on General Purpose Hardware

Thomas Lorünser, Adam Skuta, Marcus Taubert
article en

Abstract

The increasing need for privacy in machine learning has driven interest in cryptographic methods that enable computation on sensitive data. Secure multi-party computation and fully-homomorphic encryption are two prominent approaches, but their practical trade-offs are often unclear for real-world use. This work presents a pragmatic benchmark and comparison of these technologies for machine learning inference. Using representative open source frameworks, we evaluate performance across basic operations, distance metrics, regression models, and common deep learning architectures. The evaluation accounts for realistic deployment conditions, including communication overhead and partial plaintext execution. The results show that secure multi-party computation scales well to large and complex models but is strongly affected by network latency, while fully-homomorphic encryption is easier to deploy and performs well for small models and regression tasks. We conclude that the two approaches are complementary rather than competing and provide concrete guidance to help practitioners select the most suitable technology for privacy preserving machine learning in practice.

Applied SciencesVol. 16(13)
AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH (AT)
European Commission
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Cryptography and Data Security
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.