Evaluation of a mixed reality navigation simulator for training of minimally invasive interventions of the spine: a pilot didactic plan

PURPOSE: Minimally invasive interventions of the spine (MISP) involve high-risk procedures. Lack of accuracy in infiltrations or poor screw placement can lead to severe neurological, vascular, and visceral injuries. This requires better training methods for residents, including surgical simulation, to reduce patient risk and lead to more efficient surgeries with lower error rates and improved clinical outcomes. METHODS: A mixed-reality simulator for training in MISP procedures was evaluated. The simulator combines two navigation modalities: (1) virtual reality fluoroscopy simulation and (2) mixed reality with augmented and virtual reality scenes. Two interventions were selected for simulation: pure facet infiltration and transpedicular screw placement. A pilot training program was designed and implemented, comparing the two navigation modalities: fluoroscopy simulation vs. mixed-reality navigation. Ten orthopedic residents participated in the study. Their performance was evaluated by using simulator metrics. Their perceived experience was assessed through a specifically designed questionnaire. RESULTS: Residents improved overall execution times during mixed reality navigation. In particular, greater success in screw placements with shorter execution times during mixed reality navigation compared to fluoroscopy simulation. Similarly, they also achieved greater accuracy in the infiltration procedure. The questionnaire reveals that residents have a positive evaluation of the simulator and find it valuable for training purposes. CONCLUSION: Compared to fluoroscopy simulation, residents found it easier to perform tasks with the mixed reality guide in perceiving and understanding anatomy, safe pathways, and correct target locations. Overall, the simulator was deemed valuable for training. This motivates further research on stratified programs and their benefits, possibly starting with mixed reality, followed by fluoroscopy simulation. Also provides useful information for improving the simulation, including better visual feedback and patient-specific cases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Spine Journal
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-026-10110-3
Primary Topic
Surgical Simulation and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of a mixed reality navigation simulator for training of minimally invasive interventions of the spine: a pilot didactic plan

M. Castañeda, Marino Antonio Capurso-García, César F. Domínguez‐Velasco, Efraín Albor-Ramírez et al.
European Spine Journal
Surgical Simulation and Training
article

Evaluation of a mixed reality navigation simulator for training of minimally invasive interventions of the spine: a pilot didactic plan

M. Castañeda, Marino Antonio Capurso-García, César F. Domínguez‐Velasco, Efraín Albor-Ramírez, Jorge Alberto Pérez Terrazas, Felipe Camarillo, Jessica Alatorre‐Flores, Jonathan Roberto Torres-Castillo
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Minimally invasive interventions of the spine (MISP) involve high-risk procedures. Lack of accuracy in infiltrations or poor screw placement can lead to severe neurological, vascular, and visceral injuries. This requires better training methods for residents, including surgical simulation, to reduce patient risk and lead to more efficient surgeries with lower error rates and improved clinical outcomes. METHODS: A mixed-reality simulator for training in MISP procedures was evaluated. The simulator combines two navigation modalities: (1) virtual reality fluoroscopy simulation and (2) mixed reality with augmented and virtual reality scenes. Two interventions were selected for simulation: pure facet infiltration and transpedicular screw placement. A pilot training program was designed and implemented, comparing the two navigation modalities: fluoroscopy simulation vs. mixed-reality navigation. Ten orthopedic residents participated in the study. Their performance was evaluated by using simulator metrics. Their perceived experience was assessed through a specifically designed questionnaire. RESULTS: Residents improved overall execution times during mixed reality navigation. In particular, greater success in screw placements with shorter execution times during mixed reality navigation compared to fluoroscopy simulation. Similarly, they also achieved greater accuracy in the infiltration procedure. The questionnaire reveals that residents have a positive evaluation of the simulator and find it valuable for training purposes. CONCLUSION: Compared to fluoroscopy simulation, residents found it easier to perform tasks with the mixed reality guide in perceiving and understanding anatomy, safe pathways, and correct target locations. Overall, the simulator was deemed valuable for training. This motivates further research on stratified programs and their benefits, possibly starting with mixed reality, followed by fluoroscopy simulation. Also provides useful information for improving the simulation, including better visual feedback and patient-specific cases.

European Spine Journal
Hospital General de México (MX), Universidad Distrital Francisco José de Caldas (CO), Universidad de Tijuana (MX), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Surgical Simulation and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.