Towards safe and just nature conservation

Abstract Nature conservation has not halted biodiversity decline and incremental, conventional change is insufficient. Global, society‐wide transformation is needed to address the root causes of loss and conservation must retain common cause with broader efforts to reshape human–environment relationships sustainably. This paper argues that conservation is fundamentally a matter of justice for both people and planet, but policy and practice have yet to internalise the goals of safe and just transformation. The growing gap between contemporary sustainability science and dominant conservation approaches is becoming increasingly untenable. To adapt, conservation must develop core capabilities to address the justice domain and environmental complexity. Business‐as‐usual risks reinforcing inequities, perpetuating the structural drivers of biodiversity decline, political resistance and loss of legitimacy. We conclude by calling for transdisciplinary collaboration to build shared language, institutional capacity and practical tools to support a nature‐rich future in a safe and just world. Solution : Our perspective offers guiding principles that are justice‐centred and Earth systems‐focused, based on a precautionary approach to avoid unintended harms and deliver a positive duty to people and the environment. Despite the methodological challenges, the planetary crisis is too urgent to wait, and we propose pragmatic, adaptive, stepwise programme design.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/2688-8319.70284
Primary Topic
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Towards safe and just nature conservation

Chris Hill, Louise Tricklebank, Mike Clarke
Ecological Solutions and Evidence
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
article

Towards safe and just nature conservation

Chris Hill, Louise Tricklebank, Mike Clarke
article en

Abstract

Abstract Nature conservation has not halted biodiversity decline and incremental, conventional change is insufficient. Global, society‐wide transformation is needed to address the root causes of loss and conservation must retain common cause with broader efforts to reshape human–environment relationships sustainably. This paper argues that conservation is fundamentally a matter of justice for both people and planet, but policy and practice have yet to internalise the goals of safe and just transformation. The growing gap between contemporary sustainability science and dominant conservation approaches is becoming increasingly untenable. To adapt, conservation must develop core capabilities to address the justice domain and environmental complexity. Business‐as‐usual risks reinforcing inequities, perpetuating the structural drivers of biodiversity decline, political resistance and loss of legitimacy. We conclude by calling for transdisciplinary collaboration to build shared language, institutional capacity and practical tools to support a nature‐rich future in a safe and just world. Solution : Our perspective offers guiding principles that are justice‐centred and Earth systems‐focused, based on a precautionary approach to avoid unintended harms and deliver a positive duty to people and the environment. Despite the methodological challenges, the planetary crisis is too urgent to wait, and we propose pragmatic, adaptive, stepwise programme design.

Ecological Solutions and EvidenceVol. 7(3)
University of Southampton (GB)
University of Southampton
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Environmental Philosophy and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.