Dethroning the Hidden King: Why Did Horkheimer Never Become a Heideggerian?

The article offers a novel reading of the intellectual origins of the Frankfurt School critical theory by examining its overlooked prehistory in the early 1920s and Max Horkheimer’s encounter with Martin Heidegger. Unlike previous literature, it does not focus on Horkheimer’s criticisms of Being and Time (1927) but rather on his ambivalent impressions as a student of Heidegger’s postwar lectures in Freiburg. The latter, the article argues, served briefly as an inspiration and then as a negative foil to the Frankfurt School’s Freudo-Marxist paradigm that Horkheimer began to articulate at the time. The argument unfolds in three steps. First, the article examines Horkheimer’s Freiburg period more extensively than previous takes on the topic by placing special emphasis on Heidegger’s legendary Aristotle lectures, which brought him fame across Germany. Second, drawing on archival sources, it demonstrates Horkheimer’s awareness of the Aristotle lectures and his negative reactions to them. Third, in the light of recent evidence that Horkheimer had already discovered key components of his Freudo-Marxist paradigm in the early and mid-1920s, it argues that one cannot fully understand these discoveries, and thereby the birth of critical theory, without paying heed to Horkheimer’s concomitant disillusionment with Heidegger.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
History of European Ideas
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2026.2687859
Primary Topic
Critical Theory and Philosophy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dethroning the Hidden King: Why Did Horkheimer Never Become a Heideggerian?

Mikko Immanen
History of European Ideas
Critical Theory and Philosophy
article

Dethroning the Hidden King: Why Did Horkheimer Never Become a Heideggerian?

Mikko Immanen
article en

Abstract

The article offers a novel reading of the intellectual origins of the Frankfurt School critical theory by examining its overlooked prehistory in the early 1920s and Max Horkheimer’s encounter with Martin Heidegger. Unlike previous literature, it does not focus on Horkheimer’s criticisms of Being and Time (1927) but rather on his ambivalent impressions as a student of Heidegger’s postwar lectures in Freiburg. The latter, the article argues, served briefly as an inspiration and then as a negative foil to the Frankfurt School’s Freudo-Marxist paradigm that Horkheimer began to articulate at the time. The argument unfolds in three steps. First, the article examines Horkheimer’s Freiburg period more extensively than previous takes on the topic by placing special emphasis on Heidegger’s legendary Aristotle lectures, which brought him fame across Germany. Second, drawing on archival sources, it demonstrates Horkheimer’s awareness of the Aristotle lectures and his negative reactions to them. Third, in the light of recent evidence that Horkheimer had already discovered key components of his Freudo-Marxist paradigm in the early and mid-1920s, it argues that one cannot fully understand these discoveries, and thereby the birth of critical theory, without paying heed to Horkheimer’s concomitant disillusionment with Heidegger.

History of European Ideas
University of Helsinki (FI)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Critical Theory and Philosophy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.