Time Series Analysis of Temperature and Precipitation Dynamics Using <scp>CETA</scp> and <scp>MCETA</scp> Methods

ABSTRACT In order to comprehend climate variability and extremes, it is essential to evaluate hydro‐climatic trends at various risk levels. The annual mean temperature and total precipitation data from 11 meteorological stations in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa region of Pakistan were subjected to the Crossing Empirical Trend Analysis (CETA) and Modified Crossing Empirical Trend Analysis (MCETA) methods in this investigation. In CETA framework, upper and lower trend slopes are derived from maximum and minimum values identified in the first and second halves of the time series. In contrast, MCETA determines pivot values directly from cumulative distribution function (CDF)–based critical thresholds corresponding to selected risk levels (5%, 50% and 95%), enabling a risk‐oriented trend assessment. The results show that temperature series generally exhibit increasing trends across most stations, particularly at median and higher risk levels, indicating intensified thermal conditions. Precipitation trends display greater spatial variability, with several stations showing increasing trends at higher risk levels and decreasing trends at lower levels, suggesting a tendency towards more intense but less frequent precipitation events. The results indicate that MCETA outperforms both CETA and conventional trend analysis methods by offering a more comprehensive and distribution‐sensitive assessment of hydro‐climatic trends. MCETA, in contrast to conventional methods, effectively captures slope variability across various segments of the data distribution, thereby facilitating the identification of heterogeneous trend behaviours that are associated with differing risk levels. The implementation of CETA and MCETA in conjunction demonstrates that hydro‐climatic trends are not consistent throughout the distribution. This underscores the importance of risk level specific trend assessment in order to enhance hydro‐climatic analysis, climate variability interpretation and climate risk evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Climatology
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.70484
Primary Topic
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Time Series Analysis of Temperature and Precipitation Dynamics Using CETA and MCETA Methods

Gökmen Çeribaşı, Ahmet Iyad Ceyhunlu, Sajid Gul, Xia Cui et al.
International Journal of Climatology
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
article

Time Series Analysis of Temperature and Precipitation Dynamics Using CETA and MCETA Methods

Gökmen Çeribaşı, Ahmet Iyad Ceyhunlu, Sajid Gul, Xia Cui, Hamza Pi̇r, Guo Mingyan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT In order to comprehend climate variability and extremes, it is essential to evaluate hydro‐climatic trends at various risk levels. The annual mean temperature and total precipitation data from 11 meteorological stations in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa region of Pakistan were subjected to the Crossing Empirical Trend Analysis (CETA) and Modified Crossing Empirical Trend Analysis (MCETA) methods in this investigation. In CETA framework, upper and lower trend slopes are derived from maximum and minimum values identified in the first and second halves of the time series. In contrast, MCETA determines pivot values directly from cumulative distribution function (CDF)–based critical thresholds corresponding to selected risk levels (5%, 50% and 95%), enabling a risk‐oriented trend assessment. The results show that temperature series generally exhibit increasing trends across most stations, particularly at median and higher risk levels, indicating intensified thermal conditions. Precipitation trends display greater spatial variability, with several stations showing increasing trends at higher risk levels and decreasing trends at lower levels, suggesting a tendency towards more intense but less frequent precipitation events. The results indicate that MCETA outperforms both CETA and conventional trend analysis methods by offering a more comprehensive and distribution‐sensitive assessment of hydro‐climatic trends. MCETA, in contrast to conventional methods, effectively captures slope variability across various segments of the data distribution, thereby facilitating the identification of heterogeneous trend behaviours that are associated with differing risk levels. The implementation of CETA and MCETA in conjunction demonstrates that hydro‐climatic trends are not consistent throughout the distribution. This underscores the importance of risk level specific trend assessment in order to enhance hydro‐climatic analysis, climate variability interpretation and climate risk evaluation.

International Journal of Climatology
Sakarya University (TR), Guangdong University Of Finances and Economics (CN), Guangzhou University (CN), Zhengzhou Railway Vocational & Technical College (CN)
National Social Science Fund of China
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Hydrology and Drought Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.