The NIST Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Adoption Challenges and Opportunities

Artificial intelligence (AI) is being adopted at an exponential rate to improve efficiency, decision-making, and cybersecurity, but its rapid integration introduces new and often poorly understood risks, including system errors, algorithmic bias, data privacy concerns, security vulnerabilities, and ethical dilemmas. This paper examines how organizations are implementing AI and evaluates the National Institute of Standards and Technology's AI Risk Management Framework (NIST AI RMF) as a tool for managing these risks. It reviews the benefits of AI adoption alongside the risks emerging from its use in business and broader society and examines the legal and ethical challenges organizations face when implementing AI risk management, including barriers specific to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Drawing on current literature and complementary regulatory frameworks, including the EU AI Act and ISO/IEC 42001, the paper situates the NIST AI RMF's four core functions, Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage, within this broader governance landscape. It finds that the primary obstacle to effective AI governance is not a lack of standards but inconsistent and incomplete organizational implementation. The paper concludes by identifying current gaps in AI governance practice and proposing future directions for improving AI risk management and security practices across organizations of varying size and maturity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cybersecurity Education Research and Practice
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.62915/2472-2707.1296
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The NIST Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Adoption Challenges and Opportunities

Robert Honomichl, Paul Wagner, Humza Sheikh, Gillian Kennedy et al.
Journal of Cybersecurity Education Research and Practice
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The NIST Artificial Intelligence Risk Management Framework: Adoption Challenges and Opportunities

Robert Honomichl, Paul Wagner, Humza Sheikh, Gillian Kennedy, Devin Patel
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is being adopted at an exponential rate to improve efficiency, decision-making, and cybersecurity, but its rapid integration introduces new and often poorly understood risks, including system errors, algorithmic bias, data privacy concerns, security vulnerabilities, and ethical dilemmas. This paper examines how organizations are implementing AI and evaluates the National Institute of Standards and Technology's AI Risk Management Framework (NIST AI RMF) as a tool for managing these risks. It reviews the benefits of AI adoption alongside the risks emerging from its use in business and broader society and examines the legal and ethical challenges organizations face when implementing AI risk management, including barriers specific to small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). Drawing on current literature and complementary regulatory frameworks, including the EU AI Act and ISO/IEC 42001, the paper situates the NIST AI RMF's four core functions, Govern, Map, Measure, and Manage, within this broader governance landscape. It finds that the primary obstacle to effective AI governance is not a lack of standards but inconsistent and incomplete organizational implementation. The paper concludes by identifying current gaps in AI governance practice and proposing future directions for improving AI risk management and security practices across organizations of varying size and maturity.

Journal of Cybersecurity Education Research and PracticeVol. 2026(1)
University of Arizona (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.