End-to-End Deep Learning Pipeline for Multi-Sensor Aircraft Engine Vibration Fault Diagnosis

Aero-engine safety and prognostics and health management (PHM) rely on robust vibration-based fault diagnosis. However, many deep learning studies on rotating machinery are evaluated under random train–test splits that mix hardware instances and may obscure the domain shift faced in deployment. This paper presents a protocol-driven end-to-end baseline for multi-sensor aero-engine-relevant vibration diagnosis on the HIT inter-shaft bearing benchmark. Six synchronous vibration channels are segmented into fixed-length windows, standardized using source-domain statistics, and classified by a compact 1D CNN backbone with and without squeeze-and-excitation (SE) channel attention. A deeper ResNet1D baseline is further introduced to examine whether increasing backbone capacity improves cross-bearing generalization under the same source-only training protocol. We compare random segment-level splits with bearing-level cross-splits that hold out entire bearings as unseen target domains, and we report deployment-oriented indicators including balanced accuracy, false-alarm rate (FAR), and miss rate over five random seeds. Under random splits, the compact CNN baseline reaches near-ceiling test accuracy, confirming that the benchmark is readily separable under in-domain interpolation. In contrast, cross-bearing evaluation reveals severe degradation: in the representative split, the baseline CNN accuracy collapses to approximately 15% with near-zero normal-class recall, while ResNet1D improves fault sensitivity but still retains a high FAR above 88%. Additional cross-bearing permutations further show that this degradation is not attributable to a single unfavorable source–target split. These findings indicate that, under the tested source-only backbones and protocols, distribution mismatch is a dominant bottleneck for deployment-ready cross-bearing diagnosis. The results establish a reproducible baseline for protocol-driven evaluation in aero-engine PHM and motivate future work on domain adaptation, domain generalization, calibration, and sequential decision logic.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerospace
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace13070591
Primary Topic
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

End-to-End Deep Learning Pipeline for Multi-Sensor Aircraft Engine Vibration Fault Diagnosis

Haoran Pan, Chenchen Wang, Chunyan Hu, Y D Xie et al.
Aerospace
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
article

End-to-End Deep Learning Pipeline for Multi-Sensor Aircraft Engine Vibration Fault Diagnosis

Haoran Pan, Chenchen Wang, Chunyan Hu, Y D Xie, Junqiang Zhu, Jiaxian Sun
article en

Abstract

Aero-engine safety and prognostics and health management (PHM) rely on robust vibration-based fault diagnosis. However, many deep learning studies on rotating machinery are evaluated under random train–test splits that mix hardware instances and may obscure the domain shift faced in deployment. This paper presents a protocol-driven end-to-end baseline for multi-sensor aero-engine-relevant vibration diagnosis on the HIT inter-shaft bearing benchmark. Six synchronous vibration channels are segmented into fixed-length windows, standardized using source-domain statistics, and classified by a compact 1D CNN backbone with and without squeeze-and-excitation (SE) channel attention. A deeper ResNet1D baseline is further introduced to examine whether increasing backbone capacity improves cross-bearing generalization under the same source-only training protocol. We compare random segment-level splits with bearing-level cross-splits that hold out entire bearings as unseen target domains, and we report deployment-oriented indicators including balanced accuracy, false-alarm rate (FAR), and miss rate over five random seeds. Under random splits, the compact CNN baseline reaches near-ceiling test accuracy, confirming that the benchmark is readily separable under in-domain interpolation. In contrast, cross-bearing evaluation reveals severe degradation: in the representative split, the baseline CNN accuracy collapses to approximately 15% with near-zero normal-class recall, while ResNet1D improves fault sensitivity but still retains a high FAR above 88%. Additional cross-bearing permutations further show that this degradation is not attributable to a single unfavorable source–target split. These findings indicate that, under the tested source-only backbones and protocols, distribution mismatch is a dominant bottleneck for deployment-ready cross-bearing diagnosis. The results establish a reproducible baseline for protocol-driven evaluation in aero-engine PHM and motivate future work on domain adaptation, domain generalization, calibration, and sequential decision logic.

AerospaceVol. 13(7)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), National Space Science Center (CN), Institute of Engineering Thermophysics (CN), Space Engineering University (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Chinese Academy of Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.