Femoral offset aimer use is not associated with improved anatomic accuracy in hamstring ACL reconstruction: A 3D‐CT study

Abstract Purpose To assess femoral and tibial tunnel positioning after primary hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using postoperative three‐dimensional computed tomography (3D‐CT), and to evaluate whether tunnel placement differs with the use of a 7‐mm femoral offset aimer and surgeon experience. Methods This retrospective cross‐sectional study included patients aged 18–50 years who underwent Primary single‐bundle hamstring ACL reconstruction between 2022 and 2025 and had postoperative 3D‐CT imaging available. The femoral and tibial tunnel positions were assessed using validated 3D‐CT measurement methods and then classified according to the published anatomic reference ranges. The association of tunnel accuracy with 7‐mm femoral offset aimer use and surgeon experience was analysed. Interobserver reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results Eighty‐six patients were included (37.2% female; median age 25.5 years). High‐experience surgeons performed the procedures in 39.5% of cases, and a 7‐mm offset aimer was used in 81.4% ( n = 70). Interobserver reliability was good‐to‐excellent. Mean femoral depth and height were 31.3 ± 4.3% and 29.0 ± 4.5%, respectively, while the mean tibial anteroposterior and mediolateral positions were 40.7 ± 4.3% and 47.0 ± 1.9%. The femoral and tibial tunnels were anatomic in 76.7% and 67.4% of the cases, respectively. Offset aimer use was not associated with femoral anatomic accuracy ( p = 0.75) but was associated with a more posterior femoral tunnel position (depth 30.7 ± 3.9% vs. 34.5 ± 4.9%; p = 0.002). There was no difference in femoral height ( p = 0.90). Surgeon experience was not associated with anatomic femoral ( p = 0.46) or tibial ( p = 0.99) tunnel placement accuracy. Conclusion In this retrospective 3D‐CT study, 7‐mm femoral offset aimer use was associated with a more posterior femoral tunnel position but not with improved overall anatomic accuracy. Surgeon experience was not associated with femoral or tibial tunnel accuracy. The clinical relevance of these radiological findings remains uncertain. Level of Evidence Level III.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jeo2.70831
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Femoral offset aimer use is not associated with improved anatomic accuracy in hamstring ACL reconstruction: A 3D‐CT study

Joan Carles Monllau, Àngel Masferrer-Pino, Nicola Pizza, Jason Bravo et al.
Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Femoral offset aimer use is not associated with improved anatomic accuracy in hamstring ACL reconstruction: A 3D‐CT study

Joan Carles Monllau, Àngel Masferrer-Pino, Nicola Pizza, Jason Bravo, Simone Perelli, Francisco J Simón-Sánchez, Miguel A. Palacios‐Flores
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose To assess femoral and tibial tunnel positioning after primary hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using postoperative three‐dimensional computed tomography (3D‐CT), and to evaluate whether tunnel placement differs with the use of a 7‐mm femoral offset aimer and surgeon experience. Methods This retrospective cross‐sectional study included patients aged 18–50 years who underwent Primary single‐bundle hamstring ACL reconstruction between 2022 and 2025 and had postoperative 3D‐CT imaging available. The femoral and tibial tunnel positions were assessed using validated 3D‐CT measurement methods and then classified according to the published anatomic reference ranges. The association of tunnel accuracy with 7‐mm femoral offset aimer use and surgeon experience was analysed. Interobserver reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient. Results Eighty‐six patients were included (37.2% female; median age 25.5 years). High‐experience surgeons performed the procedures in 39.5% of cases, and a 7‐mm offset aimer was used in 81.4% ( n = 70). Interobserver reliability was good‐to‐excellent. Mean femoral depth and height were 31.3 ± 4.3% and 29.0 ± 4.5%, respectively, while the mean tibial anteroposterior and mediolateral positions were 40.7 ± 4.3% and 47.0 ± 1.9%. The femoral and tibial tunnels were anatomic in 76.7% and 67.4% of the cases, respectively. Offset aimer use was not associated with femoral anatomic accuracy ( p = 0.75) but was associated with a more posterior femoral tunnel position (depth 30.7 ± 3.9% vs. 34.5 ± 4.9%; p = 0.002). There was no difference in femoral height ( p = 0.90). Surgeon experience was not associated with anatomic femoral ( p = 0.46) or tibial ( p = 0.99) tunnel placement accuracy. Conclusion In this retrospective 3D‐CT study, 7‐mm femoral offset aimer use was associated with a more posterior femoral tunnel position but not with improved overall anatomic accuracy. Surgeon experience was not associated with femoral or tibial tunnel accuracy. The clinical relevance of these radiological findings remains uncertain. Level of Evidence Level III.

Journal of Experimental OrthopaedicsVol. 13(3)
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES), Hospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia (PE), Institut Català de Traumatologia i Medicina de l'Esport (ES), St Martins Hospital (GB), Hospital de Emergencias Jose Casimiro Ulloa (PE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.