Strategic Preparation for ASK2026 Accreditation in Medical Schools: Transition to a Sustainable Educational Quality Management System

This study explored the theoretical evolution of quality management in higher education and examined the conceptual relationships among quality assurance (QA), continuous quality improvement (CQI), accreditation, and quality culture in medical education. On the basis of this framework, it proposes practical strategies for preparing for Accreditation Standards of KIMEE 2026 (ASK2026) accreditation. Quality management in higher education has shifted from compliance-based QA toward a dynamic CQI model that emphasizes continuous improvement and stakeholder engagement. In medical education, accreditation has served as a key mechanism for ensuring minimum standards while also encouraging CQI. However, previous studies suggest that accreditation has had a limited direct effect on educational quality, particularly when it is implemented as a document-centered or compliance-driven process. Recent discussions have therefore emphasized the need to integrate CQI into institutional operations and to foster a quality culture that encourages active participation by faculty, students, and administrators. ASK2026 reflects this shift by emphasizing the maturity and functionality of CQI systems rather than simple compliance with accreditation standards. Effective preparation for ASK2026 requires medical schools to establish data-driven CQI monitoring systems, promote a collaborative quality culture, strengthen governance and leadership, implement competency-based education, and align quality improvement activities with scholarly educational practice. In conclusion, successful accreditation preparation requires not only compliance with standards but also institutional capacity for continuous reflection and improvement. Accreditation should therefore be understood as a process that generates and advances quality, rather than merely evaluates it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Korean Medical Education Review
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17496/kmer.26.010
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Innovations in Medical Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
13.46
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Strategic Preparation for ASK2026 Accreditation in Medical Schools: Transition to a Sustainable Educational Quality Management System

Keun Mi Lee
1 citations
Korean Medical Education Review
Innovations in Medical Education
13.46
article

Strategic Preparation for ASK2026 Accreditation in Medical Schools: Transition to a Sustainable Educational Quality Management System

Keun Mi Lee
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study explored the theoretical evolution of quality management in higher education and examined the conceptual relationships among quality assurance (QA), continuous quality improvement (CQI), accreditation, and quality culture in medical education. On the basis of this framework, it proposes practical strategies for preparing for Accreditation Standards of KIMEE 2026 (ASK2026) accreditation. Quality management in higher education has shifted from compliance-based QA toward a dynamic CQI model that emphasizes continuous improvement and stakeholder engagement. In medical education, accreditation has served as a key mechanism for ensuring minimum standards while also encouraging CQI. However, previous studies suggest that accreditation has had a limited direct effect on educational quality, particularly when it is implemented as a document-centered or compliance-driven process. Recent discussions have therefore emphasized the need to integrate CQI into institutional operations and to foster a quality culture that encourages active participation by faculty, students, and administrators. ASK2026 reflects this shift by emphasizing the maturity and functionality of CQI systems rather than simple compliance with accreditation standards. Effective preparation for ASK2026 requires medical schools to establish data-driven CQI monitoring systems, promote a collaborative quality culture, strengthen governance and leadership, implement competency-based education, and align quality improvement activities with scholarly educational practice. In conclusion, successful accreditation preparation requires not only compliance with standards but also institutional capacity for continuous reflection and improvement. Accreditation should therefore be understood as a process that generates and advances quality, rather than merely evaluates it.

Korean Medical Education ReviewVol. 28(2)
Yeungnam University Medical Center (KR), Yeungnam University (KR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Innovations in Medical Education
13.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.