Masculinity, Not Femininity, is Associated with Sexual Desirability Among Grindr Users in Australia

Abstract Whether men who have sex with men see themselves as sexy is influenced by their gender expression – that is, by their performance of masculinity and femininity. Generally, while masculine men attract others’ sexual interest, feminine men are relegated to the sexual margins. Hegemonic masculinity underpins the disproportionate value gay communities place in masculinity over femininity. Yet norms of gender expression and sexual desirability also vary between gay subcultures. Here, we tested the relationships between sexually desirability, masculinity, and femininity, and whether these relationships were moderated by participants’ membership in a gay subculture. Using dynamic structural equation modelling, we analyzed experience sampling data from 234 Grindr users ( T = 12,162) collected in May 2022. We found that masculinity, but not femininity, was associated with how sexually desirable Grindr users felt, but only limited evidence that these relationships differed between subcultures. When participants felt more masculine ( β = .09) they felt more sexually desirable, and vice versa ( β = .16). Our data suggest anti-effeminacy may act via masculinity and not femininity to affect whether men who have sex with men feel sexually desirable. The pressure to be sexy may lead men who have sex with men to invest in masculinity. In doing so, they may risk perpetuating anti-effeminacy, among other forms of discrimination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sex Roles
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-026-01664-z
Primary Topic
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Masculinity, Not Femininity, is Associated with Sexual Desirability Among Grindr Users in Australia

Scott K. Griffiths, Jordan D. X. Hinton, Emma Austen, Emily A. Harris et al.
Sex Roles
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
article

Masculinity, Not Femininity, is Associated with Sexual Desirability Among Grindr Users in Australia

Scott K. Griffiths, Jordan D. X. Hinton, Emma Austen, Emily A. Harris, Elise K. Kalokerinos, Wesley Grey
article en

Abstract

Abstract Whether men who have sex with men see themselves as sexy is influenced by their gender expression – that is, by their performance of masculinity and femininity. Generally, while masculine men attract others’ sexual interest, feminine men are relegated to the sexual margins. Hegemonic masculinity underpins the disproportionate value gay communities place in masculinity over femininity. Yet norms of gender expression and sexual desirability also vary between gay subcultures. Here, we tested the relationships between sexually desirability, masculinity, and femininity, and whether these relationships were moderated by participants’ membership in a gay subculture. Using dynamic structural equation modelling, we analyzed experience sampling data from 234 Grindr users ( T = 12,162) collected in May 2022. We found that masculinity, but not femininity, was associated with how sexually desirable Grindr users felt, but only limited evidence that these relationships differed between subcultures. When participants felt more masculine ( β = .09) they felt more sexually desirable, and vice versa ( β = .16). Our data suggest anti-effeminacy may act via masculinity and not femininity to affect whether men who have sex with men feel sexually desirable. The pressure to be sexy may lead men who have sex with men to invest in masculinity. In doing so, they may risk perpetuating anti-effeminacy, among other forms of discrimination.

Sex RolesVol. 92(4)
The University of Melbourne (AU), La Trobe University (AU), Australian Psychological Society (AU)
University of Melbourne
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.