Cinematic Time and Traumatic Ethics: A Deleuzian Reading of Catastrophe in Paul Auster’s <i>Man in the Dark</i>

In Man in the Dark, Paul Auster turns to cinematic temporality to reimagine the literary representation of catastrophe and trauma. Reading the novel through Gilles Deleuze’s film-philosophy, this essay argues that Auster performs a narrative translation of the time-image, moving from the affective intensity to the crystalline multiplicity of pure memory. Through close analysis, I demonstrate how Auster transposes the affection-image into prose to render violence as sensory impact; employs spatial-temporal metaphors to formalize trauma’s disjointed durée; and constructs a crystalline narrative mode that accesses Bergsonian “pure memory,” transforming traumatic recall into a virtual field of potential. By staging this progression, Auster does not merely represent trauma but enacts a poetics of temporal ethics, one that resists narrative closure and opens trauma to reconfiguration. Ultimately, this study positions Man in the Dark as a key intervention in contemporary debates about intermediality, trauma narration, and the ethical possibilities of literary form.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2026.2697032
Primary Topic
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cinematic Time and Traumatic Ethics: A Deleuzian Reading of Catastrophe in Paul Auster’s Man in the Dark

Ding Dong
Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
article

Cinematic Time and Traumatic Ethics: A Deleuzian Reading of Catastrophe in Paul Auster’s Man in the Dark

Ding Dong
article en

Abstract

In Man in the Dark, Paul Auster turns to cinematic temporality to reimagine the literary representation of catastrophe and trauma. Reading the novel through Gilles Deleuze’s film-philosophy, this essay argues that Auster performs a narrative translation of the time-image, moving from the affective intensity to the crystalline multiplicity of pure memory. Through close analysis, I demonstrate how Auster transposes the affection-image into prose to render violence as sensory impact; employs spatial-temporal metaphors to formalize trauma’s disjointed durée; and constructs a crystalline narrative mode that accesses Bergsonian “pure memory,” transforming traumatic recall into a virtual field of potential. By staging this progression, Auster does not merely represent trauma but enacts a poetics of temporal ethics, one that resists narrative closure and opens trauma to reconfiguration. Ultimately, this study positions Man in the Dark as a key intervention in contemporary debates about intermediality, trauma narration, and the ethical possibilities of literary form.

Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction
Shanghai University of Finance and Economics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cinematic Time and Traumatic Ethics: A Deleuzian Reading of Catastrophe in Paul Auster’s <i>Man in the Dark</i> — Ding Dong · Critique Studies in Contemporary Fiction (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS