Reconfiguring the multiple streams: how focusing events shape agenda setting in China

Focusing events critically influence governmental policy agendas by catalyzing response-oriented agenda setting, a key instrument for addressing emergent public issues. Although their role is acknowledged, the mechanisms that trigger such agenda setting remain underexplored, particularly in non-Western contexts. In this study, we systematically analyzed 40 Chinese focusing events (2018–2023) using the multiple streams framework and qualitative comparative analysis to identify causal pathways that activate response-oriented agenda setting. Our findings reveal four distinct models—clear-pointing, problem-driven, high-level-driven, and composite—demonstrating that agenda setting arises from the convergence of the problem, policy, and political streams, adapted to China’s political ecosystem. These insights refine the multiple streams framework and offer evidence-based guidance for policymakers managing focusing events. This study advances the understanding of agenda setting dynamics in non-Western contexts, highlighting the interplay among societal pressures, the exercise of power, and policy communities in shaping governmental responsiveness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Chinese Governance
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2026.2690358
Primary Topic
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reconfiguring the multiple streams: how focusing events shape agenda setting in China

Ying Chen, Qixin Zhou
Journal of Chinese Governance
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
article

Reconfiguring the multiple streams: how focusing events shape agenda setting in China

Ying Chen, Qixin Zhou
article en

Abstract

Focusing events critically influence governmental policy agendas by catalyzing response-oriented agenda setting, a key instrument for addressing emergent public issues. Although their role is acknowledged, the mechanisms that trigger such agenda setting remain underexplored, particularly in non-Western contexts. In this study, we systematically analyzed 40 Chinese focusing events (2018–2023) using the multiple streams framework and qualitative comparative analysis to identify causal pathways that activate response-oriented agenda setting. Our findings reveal four distinct models—clear-pointing, problem-driven, high-level-driven, and composite—demonstrating that agenda setting arises from the convergence of the problem, policy, and political streams, adapted to China’s political ecosystem. These insights refine the multiple streams framework and offer evidence-based guidance for policymakers managing focusing events. This study advances the understanding of agenda setting dynamics in non-Western contexts, highlighting the interplay among societal pressures, the exercise of power, and policy communities in shaping governmental responsiveness.

Journal of Chinese Governance
Beijing Normal University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.