Evaluation of Active and Passive Brake Emission Mitigation Strategies in Real Driving Scenarios

Brake wear particles are an increasingly relevant source of traffic-related particulate emissions and are addressed by the recently introduced Euro 7 emission regulation. Airborne fractions of brake wear emissions, in particular, have been associated with adverse effects on human health and other organisms. Although several brake particle mitigation strategies have demonstrated promising results under controlled laboratory conditions, their effectiveness under variable open-road driving conditions remains insufficiently understood. This study therefore investigates the transfer of two test-bench-validated mitigation strategies to a fully instrumented passenger vehicle capable of measuring brake particle number (PN) and particulate mass (PM) emissions. The first strategy is a passive approach based on a modified brake pad–disc material pairing, while the second is an active filtration system that extracts particle-laden air directly from the brake friction zone. Both approaches were evaluated during two open-road driving cycles: a real driving emissions (RDE)-compliant cycle and a more dynamic cycle characterized by higher brake stress. Airborne particle emissions were measured over a size range from 300 nm to 10 µm. During the RDE-compliant cycle, the passive approach reduced PN and PM emissions by 44% and 94%, respectively, compared with the reference brake system. Under the higher thermal and mechanical loads of the dynamic cycle, the reductions decreased to 10% for PN and 64% for PM. The active filtration system achieved an increase in PN of 4% in RDE conditions and 11% under high-severity driving. Nevertheless, PM emissions were reduced by 23–97%, depending on its operating mode of the filtration system and the associated airflow and energy demand. For high-severity driving, the PM emissions have been reduced by 40% compared to the reference braking system. These results show that both mitigation approaches hold the potential to reduce brake particle emissions under open-road conditions, although their effectiveness depends strongly on brake load and system operation. The study extends previous laboratory-based investigations by directly comparing passive and active mitigation strategies on the same vehicle under real-world driving conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Atmosphere
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos17070662
Primary Topic
Air Quality and Health Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of Active and Passive Brake Emission Mitigation Strategies in Real Driving Scenarios

Sebastian Gramstat, Miles Kunze, Valentin G. Ivanov, Alexander Hentschel et al.
Atmosphere
Air Quality and Health Impacts
article

Evaluation of Active and Passive Brake Emission Mitigation Strategies in Real Driving Scenarios

Sebastian Gramstat, Miles Kunze, Valentin G. Ivanov, Alexander Hentschel, Patrick Habedank
article en

Abstract

Brake wear particles are an increasingly relevant source of traffic-related particulate emissions and are addressed by the recently introduced Euro 7 emission regulation. Airborne fractions of brake wear emissions, in particular, have been associated with adverse effects on human health and other organisms. Although several brake particle mitigation strategies have demonstrated promising results under controlled laboratory conditions, their effectiveness under variable open-road driving conditions remains insufficiently understood. This study therefore investigates the transfer of two test-bench-validated mitigation strategies to a fully instrumented passenger vehicle capable of measuring brake particle number (PN) and particulate mass (PM) emissions. The first strategy is a passive approach based on a modified brake pad–disc material pairing, while the second is an active filtration system that extracts particle-laden air directly from the brake friction zone. Both approaches were evaluated during two open-road driving cycles: a real driving emissions (RDE)-compliant cycle and a more dynamic cycle characterized by higher brake stress. Airborne particle emissions were measured over a size range from 300 nm to 10 µm. During the RDE-compliant cycle, the passive approach reduced PN and PM emissions by 44% and 94%, respectively, compared with the reference brake system. Under the higher thermal and mechanical loads of the dynamic cycle, the reductions decreased to 10% for PN and 64% for PM. The active filtration system achieved an increase in PN of 4% in RDE conditions and 11% under high-severity driving. Nevertheless, PM emissions were reduced by 23–97%, depending on its operating mode of the filtration system and the associated airflow and energy demand. For high-severity driving, the PM emissions have been reduced by 40% compared to the reference braking system. These results show that both mitigation approaches hold the potential to reduce brake particle emissions under open-road conditions, although their effectiveness depends strongly on brake load and system operation. The study extends previous laboratory-based investigations by directly comparing passive and active mitigation strategies on the same vehicle under real-world driving conditions.

AtmosphereVol. 17(7)
Technische Universität Ilmenau (DE), Audi (Germany) (DE)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Air Quality and Health Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.