Beyond Functional Mobility: Psychosocial Adaptation as a Distinct Dimension of Lower Limb Prosthetic Rehabilitation

Background Functional mobility alone may not fully reflect rehabilitation success after lower limb amputation. Patient-reported prosthetic satisfaction, psychosocial adaptation, and perceived functional competence may represent partially independent dimensions of recovery. This study investigated the multidimensional relationships among mobility, prosthesis-related satisfaction, and psychosocial adaptation in individuals with traumatic lower limb amputation. Methods This cross-sectional observational study included 70 adults with traumatic lower limb amputation who were current prosthesis users. Participants underwent multidimensional assessment using K-level classification, Locomotor Capability Index-5 (LCI-5), Houghton Scale, Timed Up and Go (TUG), Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES), SF-12, and Falls Efficacy Scale. Participants were categorized into lower activity (K1–K2) and higher activity (K3–K4) groups. Results The higher activity group demonstrated significantly better Houghton scores ( p = 0.008), TUG performance ( p < 0.001), TAPES disability scores ( p < 0.001), prosthesis satisfaction ( p = 0.008), SF-12 physical ( p < 0.001), SF-12 mental ( p < 0.001), and LCI-5 scores ( p < 0.001). In contrast, TAPES psychosocial scores ( p = 0.176) and fall efficacy ( p = 0.062) did not significantly differ between groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed the strongest discriminative performance for the Houghton Scale (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.809, 95% CI: 0.710–0.908) and LCI-5 (AUC = 0.802, 95% CI: 0.699–0.905), followed by SF-12 physical (AUC = 0.750) and SF-12 mental scores (AUC = 0.732). Hierarchical clustering suggested a dominant functional mobility cluster and a partially distinct psychosocial-prosthetic adaptation cluster. Conclusion K-level and mobility-based measures primarily reflect ambulatory capacity but do not fully capture psychosocial adaptation. Multidimensional assessment may better characterize rehabilitation success after lower limb amputation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/03601293261464183
Primary Topic
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond Functional Mobility: Psychosocial Adaptation as a Distinct Dimension of Lower Limb Prosthetic Rehabilitation

Ömer Faruk Bucak, Nazire BAGATİR, Yusuf Çelik, Çiğdem Çınar et al.
Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
article

Beyond Functional Mobility: Psychosocial Adaptation as a Distinct Dimension of Lower Limb Prosthetic Rehabilitation

Ömer Faruk Bucak, Nazire BAGATİR, Yusuf Çelik, Çiğdem Çınar, Muhsin Doran
article en

Abstract

Background Functional mobility alone may not fully reflect rehabilitation success after lower limb amputation. Patient-reported prosthetic satisfaction, psychosocial adaptation, and perceived functional competence may represent partially independent dimensions of recovery. This study investigated the multidimensional relationships among mobility, prosthesis-related satisfaction, and psychosocial adaptation in individuals with traumatic lower limb amputation. Methods This cross-sectional observational study included 70 adults with traumatic lower limb amputation who were current prosthesis users. Participants underwent multidimensional assessment using K-level classification, Locomotor Capability Index-5 (LCI-5), Houghton Scale, Timed Up and Go (TUG), Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales (TAPES), SF-12, and Falls Efficacy Scale. Participants were categorized into lower activity (K1–K2) and higher activity (K3–K4) groups. Results The higher activity group demonstrated significantly better Houghton scores ( p = 0.008), TUG performance ( p < 0.001), TAPES disability scores ( p < 0.001), prosthesis satisfaction ( p = 0.008), SF-12 physical ( p < 0.001), SF-12 mental ( p < 0.001), and LCI-5 scores ( p < 0.001). In contrast, TAPES psychosocial scores ( p = 0.176) and fall efficacy ( p = 0.062) did not significantly differ between groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed the strongest discriminative performance for the Houghton Scale (area under the ROC curve [AUC] = 0.809, 95% CI: 0.710–0.908) and LCI-5 (AUC = 0.802, 95% CI: 0.699–0.905), followed by SF-12 physical (AUC = 0.750) and SF-12 mental scores (AUC = 0.732). Hierarchical clustering suggested a dominant functional mobility cluster and a partially distinct psychosocial-prosthetic adaptation cluster. Conclusion K-level and mobility-based measures primarily reflect ambulatory capacity but do not fully capture psychosocial adaptation. Multidimensional assessment may better characterize rehabilitation success after lower limb amputation.

Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research
University of Health Science (KH), Biruni University (TR), Liv Hospital (TR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.