Overestimation Risk in River-Lake Health Assessment: Dual Uncertainty (Indicator-Weight) Perspective

River-lake health assessment is critical for ecological governance, but overestimation risk induced by dual uncertainties (predictive uncertainty of indicator values and methodological uncertainty of weights) compromises the reliability of assessment results and governance decisions. To address this gap, this study proposes a general risk analysis framework integrating dual uncertainty quantification and overestimation risk coupling. First, a multi-dimensional assessment system with 12 key indicators (covering hydrology, water quality, aquatic biology, and social services) was established via Meta-analysis and quantitative screening. For uncertainty quantification: the Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN) model was used to characterize indicator value uncertainty based on 1264 historical monitoring samples; four complementary weighting methods (AHP, EWM, CRITIC, PCA) were integrated with a game theory-based framework (Nash equilibrium) to resolve weight conflicts, and weight uncertainty was quantified via normal distribution assumption (mean = coordinated weight, standard deviation = 1/10 of mean). The First-Order Second-Moment (FOSM) method was then adopted to establish a coupled “dual uncertainties-overestimation risk” model, quantifying the probability and magnitude of overestimation risk. Validated in Poyang Lake (China’s largest freshwater lake), results identified total phosphorus (TP), total nitrogen (TN), and Fish Biological Loss Index (FBLI) as high-risk indicators, with maximum allowable thresholds of 5.10–7.40, 7.04–9.38, and 6.05–9.02 across risk levels (1–50%), respectively. The comprehensive overestimation risk score ranged from 74.16 to 81.17, providing actionable thresholds for governance. This framework systematically addresses the insufficient consideration of dual uncertainties in existing studies, offering a scientific and operable tool for improving the reliability of river-lake health assessment and supporting targeted ecological protection decisions globally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w18131590
Primary Topic
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Overestimation Risk in River-Lake Health Assessment: Dual Uncertainty (Indicator-Weight) Perspective

X Y Liu, LIU Fagen, Jinhua Dai, Yao Wu et al.
Water
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
article

Overestimation Risk in River-Lake Health Assessment: Dual Uncertainty (Indicator-Weight) Perspective

X Y Liu, LIU Fagen, Jinhua Dai, Yao Wu, Zhongwen Xiong, Huan Lu
article en

Abstract

River-lake health assessment is critical for ecological governance, but overestimation risk induced by dual uncertainties (predictive uncertainty of indicator values and methodological uncertainty of weights) compromises the reliability of assessment results and governance decisions. To address this gap, this study proposes a general risk analysis framework integrating dual uncertainty quantification and overestimation risk coupling. First, a multi-dimensional assessment system with 12 key indicators (covering hydrology, water quality, aquatic biology, and social services) was established via Meta-analysis and quantitative screening. For uncertainty quantification: the Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINN) model was used to characterize indicator value uncertainty based on 1264 historical monitoring samples; four complementary weighting methods (AHP, EWM, CRITIC, PCA) were integrated with a game theory-based framework (Nash equilibrium) to resolve weight conflicts, and weight uncertainty was quantified via normal distribution assumption (mean = coordinated weight, standard deviation = 1/10 of mean). The First-Order Second-Moment (FOSM) method was then adopted to establish a coupled “dual uncertainties-overestimation risk” model, quantifying the probability and magnitude of overestimation risk. Validated in Poyang Lake (China’s largest freshwater lake), results identified total phosphorus (TP), total nitrogen (TN), and Fish Biological Loss Index (FBLI) as high-risk indicators, with maximum allowable thresholds of 5.10–7.40, 7.04–9.38, and 6.05–9.02 across risk levels (1–50%), respectively. The comprehensive overestimation risk score ranged from 74.16 to 81.17, providing actionable thresholds for governance. This framework systematically addresses the insufficient consideration of dual uncertainties in existing studies, offering a scientific and operable tool for improving the reliability of river-lake health assessment and supporting targeted ecological protection decisions globally.

WaterVol. 18(13)
State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering (CN), Jiangxi Provincial Institute of Water Sciences (CN), Beijing Municipal Ecological and Environmental Monitoring Center (CN)
Department of Water Resources
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.