Cycle-dependent variation of tumor absorbed dose rates in 177Lu-DOTATATE therapies

We aimed to evaluate the variability of tumor absorbed dose rate at 24 hours post-injection across multiple cycles of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE therapy. Using patient-specific Monte Carlo simulations, we quantified cycle-dependent variations in tumor absorbed dose rate and explicitly separated self- and cross-irradiation contributions. Five patients, with neuroendocrine tumor metastases, who received 3 to 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy with a fixed activity of 7.4 GBq per cycle, were studied. All patients underwent single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging 24 hours after each injection cycle. The GATE Monte Carlo framework (version 8.1) was used for voxel-level tumor dosimetry. Dosimetry was performed for 25 individual lesions, giving a total of 92 individual absorbed dose assessments across all cycles. We focused on relative, cycle-to-cycle comparison of tumor self- and cross-absorbed dose rate. &#xD;The cross-absorbed dose from surrounding tissues comprised a substantial fraction of total tumor absorbed dose rate, up to 32.64% across individual tumors and cycles. Linear mixed-effects analysis across all five patients revealed statistically significant differences in cross-absorbed dose contribution across treatment cycles (F-values: 4.433-24.607; p-values: 0.002-<0.001). Descriptive statistics revealed that all 25 tumor self-absorbed dose changes ranged from 26.0% to 114.4% (mean: 63.4% ± 27.4%, median: 63.2%) during 3 to 4 cycles, while cross-absorbed dose changes ranged from 4.6% to 330.5% (mean: 98.8% ± 89.4%, median: 76.5%).&#xD;A key finding of our study is that the cross-absorbed dose originating from organs containing or surrounding the tumor can substantially contribute to the absorbed dose rate, a factor that must be considered for accurate estimations at each cycle of treatment. Despite identical injected activities, tumor self- and cross-dose substantially changed over cycles. These results demonstrate the necessity for patient-specific activity administration protocols and cycle-specific dosimetry assessments in 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy, supporting a paradigm shift from fixed-activity regimens toward individualized, image-based dosimetry-guided treatment strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/ae8453
Primary Topic
Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cycle-dependent variation of tumor absorbed dose rates in 177Lu-DOTATATE therapies

Mohammad Ali Tajik‐Mansoury, Narges Jokar, Arman Rahmim, Mehrangiz Amiri et al.
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
article

Cycle-dependent variation of tumor absorbed dose rates in 177Lu-DOTATATE therapies

Mohammad Ali Tajik‐Mansoury, Narges Jokar, Arman Rahmim, Mehrangiz Amiri, Mohammad Reza Deevband, Ali Shabestani Monfared, Soraya Khafri, Hamid Abdollahi, Milad Peer-Firozjaei
article en

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the variability of tumor absorbed dose rate at 24 hours post-injection across multiple cycles of ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTATATE therapy. Using patient-specific Monte Carlo simulations, we quantified cycle-dependent variations in tumor absorbed dose rate and explicitly separated self- and cross-irradiation contributions. Five patients, with neuroendocrine tumor metastases, who received 3 to 4 cycles of 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy with a fixed activity of 7.4 GBq per cycle, were studied. All patients underwent single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) imaging 24 hours after each injection cycle. The GATE Monte Carlo framework (version 8.1) was used for voxel-level tumor dosimetry. Dosimetry was performed for 25 individual lesions, giving a total of 92 individual absorbed dose assessments across all cycles. We focused on relative, cycle-to-cycle comparison of tumor self- and cross-absorbed dose rate. &#xD;The cross-absorbed dose from surrounding tissues comprised a substantial fraction of total tumor absorbed dose rate, up to 32.64% across individual tumors and cycles. Linear mixed-effects analysis across all five patients revealed statistically significant differences in cross-absorbed dose contribution across treatment cycles (F-values: 4.433-24.607; p-values: 0.002-<0.001). Descriptive statistics revealed that all 25 tumor self-absorbed dose changes ranged from 26.0% to 114.4% (mean: 63.4% ± 27.4%, median: 63.2%) during 3 to 4 cycles, while cross-absorbed dose changes ranged from 4.6% to 330.5% (mean: 98.8% ± 89.4%, median: 76.5%).&#xD;A key finding of our study is that the cross-absorbed dose originating from organs containing or surrounding the tumor can substantially contribute to the absorbed dose rate, a factor that must be considered for accurate estimations at each cycle of treatment. Despite identical injected activities, tumor self- and cross-dose substantially changed over cycles. These results demonstrate the necessity for patient-specific activity administration protocols and cycle-specific dosimetry assessments in 177Lu-DOTATATE therapy, supporting a paradigm shift from fixed-activity regimens toward individualized, image-based dosimetry-guided treatment strategies.

Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
University of British Columbia (CA), Johns Hopkins University (US), Universidad Braulio Carrillo (CR), Bushehr University of Medical Sciences (IR), Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences (IR), Babol University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Babol University of Medical Sciences, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.