Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading

This research investigated whether individual differences in vocabulary knowledge influence mind wandering during first language (L1) and foreign language (L2) reading. In four independent studies involving different L1 and L2 pairings - German and English (Study 1), French and English (Study 2), English and German (Study 3), and German and French (Study 4) - participants completed measures of mind-wandering frequency, perceived reading difficulty, and comprehension. Studies 2-4 additionally assessed the intentionality of mind wandering. Across all studies, participants with lower vocabulary knowledge in their L2 compared to L1 showed higher frequencies of mind wandering during L2 compared to L1 reading. Studies 1 and 2 additionally included participants with comparable L1/L2 vocabulary knowledge and found no significant L1-L2 differences in mind wandering. Consistent with previous research, our findings suggest that the intentionality of mind wandering is sensitive to task demands. When L2 vocabulary knowledge impaired comprehension on the textbase and situation model levels, participants showed increased unintentional but not intentional mind wandering in L2 compared to L1 (Studies 3 and 4). Under these conditions, task demands likely exceeded available executive-control resources, allowing automatic and unintentional task-unrelated thoughts to intrude. In contrast, when L2 vocabulary supported comprehension at least on the textbase level (Studies 1 and 2), metacognitive evaluations became more influential. Specifically, participants showed more intentional but not unintentional mind wandering in L2 compared to L1, and perceived difficulty mediated the relationship between L2 vocabulary knowledge and mind wandering. Here, participants likely disengaged deliberately when the cognitive costs of L2 reading outweighed its perceived benefits.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-026-02949-w
Primary Topic
Mind wandering and attention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading

Tobias Richter, Marina Klimovich, Jean‐François Rouet
Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
Mind wandering and attention
article

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading

Tobias Richter, Marina Klimovich, Jean‐François Rouet
article en

Abstract

This research investigated whether individual differences in vocabulary knowledge influence mind wandering during first language (L1) and foreign language (L2) reading. In four independent studies involving different L1 and L2 pairings - German and English (Study 1), French and English (Study 2), English and German (Study 3), and German and French (Study 4) - participants completed measures of mind-wandering frequency, perceived reading difficulty, and comprehension. Studies 2-4 additionally assessed the intentionality of mind wandering. Across all studies, participants with lower vocabulary knowledge in their L2 compared to L1 showed higher frequencies of mind wandering during L2 compared to L1 reading. Studies 1 and 2 additionally included participants with comparable L1/L2 vocabulary knowledge and found no significant L1-L2 differences in mind wandering. Consistent with previous research, our findings suggest that the intentionality of mind wandering is sensitive to task demands. When L2 vocabulary knowledge impaired comprehension on the textbase and situation model levels, participants showed increased unintentional but not intentional mind wandering in L2 compared to L1 (Studies 3 and 4). Under these conditions, task demands likely exceeded available executive-control resources, allowing automatic and unintentional task-unrelated thoughts to intrude. In contrast, when L2 vocabulary supported comprehension at least on the textbase level (Studies 1 and 2), metacognitive evaluations became more influential. Specifically, participants showed more intentional but not unintentional mind wandering in L2 compared to L1, and perceived difficulty mediated the relationship between L2 vocabulary knowledge and mind wandering. Here, participants likely disengaged deliberately when the cognitive costs of L2 reading outweighed its perceived benefits.

Psychonomic Bulletin & ReviewVol. 33(6)
University of Würzburg (DE), Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition et l'Apprentissage (FR)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Mind wandering and attention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.