Teaching Democracy Through Instruction or Experience: A Qualitative Evaluation of Two Sets of Lessons

This study examines how different teaching methods about democracy are perceived by teachers and students in Dutch secondary vocational education. We evaluated two sets of lessons: one instruction-based (through lectures and assignments) and one experience-based (through simulations). Eight teachers implemented one or both of these sets of lessons, which were evaluated through thirty-one teacher interviews and twenty-seven student group interviews. The evaluations focus on the classroom practices that were used as design principles for the lessons, namely: meaningful embedding, providing multiple perspectives, thinking about solutions from divergent perspectives, and critical reflection on the subject matter. Overall, teachers and students found the lessons efficacious for students’ learning about democracy. Several challenges were also discussed, including how to handle emotions, the risk of students not engaging with perspectives, the risk of premature and one-sided solutions, and students struggling with argumentation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Social Studies Research
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0885985x261458791
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching Democracy Through Instruction or Experience: A Qualitative Evaluation of Two Sets of Lessons

Ron Oostdam, Jip Y. Teegelbeckers, Hessel Nieuwelink
The Journal of Social Studies Research
Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
article

Teaching Democracy Through Instruction or Experience: A Qualitative Evaluation of Two Sets of Lessons

Ron Oostdam, Jip Y. Teegelbeckers, Hessel Nieuwelink
article en

Abstract

This study examines how different teaching methods about democracy are perceived by teachers and students in Dutch secondary vocational education. We evaluated two sets of lessons: one instruction-based (through lectures and assignments) and one experience-based (through simulations). Eight teachers implemented one or both of these sets of lessons, which were evaluated through thirty-one teacher interviews and twenty-seven student group interviews. The evaluations focus on the classroom practices that were used as design principles for the lessons, namely: meaningful embedding, providing multiple perspectives, thinking about solutions from divergent perspectives, and critical reflection on the subject matter. Overall, teachers and students found the lessons efficacious for students’ learning about democracy. Several challenges were also discussed, including how to handle emotions, the risk of students not engaging with perspectives, the risk of premature and one-sided solutions, and students struggling with argumentation.

The Journal of Social Studies Research
Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Innovative Teaching Methodologies in Social Sciences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.