Evaluation of candidate models for the 14th generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field

In November 2024, the 14th revision of the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) was issued by the International Association of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy (IAGA) Division V Working Group (V-MOD). This revision comprises two new spherical harmonic main field models for epochs 2020.0 (DGRF-2020) and 2025.0 (IGRF-2025) and a model of the predicted secular variation for the interval 2025.0 $$-$$ 2030.0 (SV-2025–2030), all provided as internal Gauss coefficients to degree and order 13 for DGRF-2020 and IGRF-2025, and degree and order 8 for SV-2025–2030. The models were produced from candidates submitted by nineteen international teams. The candidate models were evaluated by an expert international volunteer Taskforce. Comparisons between all candidates as well as to mean, median and Huber-weighted averages of all candidates were made using well-established statistical criteria. These analyses were used to identify, for example, the variation between Gauss coefficients or geographical regions, where the candidate models strongly differed. The majority of candidates were sufficiently close that the differences can be explained primarily by individual modelling methodologies and data selection strategies. None of the candidates were sufficiently different to warrant their exclusion. The IAGA V-MOD Taskforce thus voted for two approaches: the median of the Gauss coefficients of the candidates for the DGRF-2020 and the computed Huber mean in space for the IGRF-2025 and SV-2025–2030 models. In this paper, we document the evaluation of the candidate models and provide details of the approach used to derive the final IGRF-14 products.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth Planets and Space
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-026-02382-2
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.84

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of candidate models for the 14th generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field

Ciarán Beggan, M. Korte, L. Chauvet, E. Thebault et al.
1 citations
Earth Planets and Space
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
5.84
article

Evaluation of candidate models for the 14th generation International Geomagnetic Reference Field

Ciarán Beggan, M. Korte, L. Chauvet, E. Thebault, M Rother, M. V. da Silva, V. Lesur, H. McCreadie, L. Gailler, C. Kloss, M. Fillion, A. Chulliat, G. Balasis, C. Xiong, T. Minami, Y. Lin, S. Nakano, I. Wardinski, S Sato, G. Hulot, A. Grayver, W. Brown, P. Alken, M. Serrano, M. Matsushima, F. Terra-Nova, M. Nair, H. Toh, F. J. Pavón-Carrasco, A. Smith, S. Califf
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In November 2024, the 14th revision of the International Geomagnetic Reference Field (IGRF) was issued by the International Association of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy (IAGA) Division V Working Group (V-MOD). This revision comprises two new spherical harmonic main field models for epochs 2020.0 (DGRF-2020) and 2025.0 (IGRF-2025) and a model of the predicted secular variation for the interval 2025.0 $$-$$ 2030.0 (SV-2025–2030), all provided as internal Gauss coefficients to degree and order 13 for DGRF-2020 and IGRF-2025, and degree and order 8 for SV-2025–2030. The models were produced from candidates submitted by nineteen international teams. The candidate models were evaluated by an expert international volunteer Taskforce. Comparisons between all candidates as well as to mean, median and Huber-weighted averages of all candidates were made using well-established statistical criteria. These analyses were used to identify, for example, the variation between Gauss coefficients or geographical regions, where the candidate models strongly differed. The majority of candidates were sufficiently close that the differences can be explained primarily by individual modelling methodologies and data selection strategies. None of the candidates were sufficiently different to warrant their exclusion. The IAGA V-MOD Taskforce thus voted for two approaches: the median of the Gauss coefficients of the candidates for the DGRF-2020 and the computed Huber mean in space for the IGRF-2025 and SV-2025–2030 models. In this paper, we document the evaluation of the candidate models and provide details of the approach used to derive the final IGRF-14 products.

Earth Planets and SpaceVol. 78(1)
Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Planetary Science Institute (US), British Geological Survey (GB), Institut de physique du globe de Paris (FR), Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (US), University of Cologne (DE), Université Paris Cité (FR), Kyoto University (JP), Université Nantes Angers Le Mans (FR), Observatoire astronomique de Strasbourg (FR), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), Wuhan University (CN), National Observatory of Athens (GR), Laboratoire Magmas et Volcans (FR), The Institute of Statistical Mathematics (JP), Laboratoire de Planétologie et Géosciences (FR), Instituto de Geociencias (ES), GFZ Helmholtz Centre for Geosciences (DE), NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information (US), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Kobe University (JP), Université de Strasbourg (FR), Technical University of Denmark (DK), University of Edinburgh (GB)
UK Research and Innovation, China National Space Administration, European Space Agency, British Geological Survey, Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
5.84
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.