Visual electrophysiology in carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: To systematically evaluate changes in ocular electrophysiological function following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and to determine whether electroretinography (ERG) and visual evoked potentials (VEP) can detect postoperative functional recovery of the retina and visual pathways. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted from inception to August 2025. Observational studies assessing electrophysiological outcomes (ERG, VEP, multifocal recordings, or electrooculography [EOG]) before and after CEA in adults with carotid stenosis were included. Study quality was evaluated using the NHLBI Study Quality Assessment Tools. Due to substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, a quantitative synthesis was not performed. RESULTS: Four prospective observational studies were included, involving 95 patients with predominantly severe carotid stenosis (≥ 70%), with one cohort applying a ≥ 60% threshold. Electrophysiological findings were heterogeneous: VEP parameters generally showed no consistent postoperative improvement, whereas ERG demonstrated significant enhancement of oscillatory potentials and a-/b-waves amplitudes in 3 of the 4 included studies. Visual field indices improved in several cohorts, while structural parameters, particularly retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, remained stable. Changes in intraocular pressure were inconsistently reported. Overall methodological quality indicated a moderate-to-high risk of bias, primarily due to small sample sizes, lack of adjustment for confounders, and variability in electrophysiological protocols. CONCLUSION: The available evidence, while preliminary and exploratory, suggests a possible association between CEA and postoperative changes in electrophysiological parameters, most notably ERG-derived measures. These findings should be interpreted with considerable caution given the small number of studies, limited sample sizes, and substantial methodological heterogeneity. Whether ocular electrophysiology holds clinical utility in the perioperative assessment of carotid disease remains to be established by larger, adequately powered, and standardized prospective studies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-026-00895-2
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visual electrophysiology in carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review

João Pinheiro-Costa, João P. Rocha-Neves, José Paulo Andrade, João Coelho et al.
International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
article

Visual electrophysiology in carotid endarterectomy: a systematic review

João Pinheiro-Costa, João P. Rocha-Neves, José Paulo Andrade, João Coelho, Ana Marta, André Ferreira, Sofia Pacheco-Moreira
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To systematically evaluate changes in ocular electrophysiological function following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and to determine whether electroretinography (ERG) and visual evoked potentials (VEP) can detect postoperative functional recovery of the retina and visual pathways. METHODS: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science was conducted from inception to August 2025. Observational studies assessing electrophysiological outcomes (ERG, VEP, multifocal recordings, or electrooculography [EOG]) before and after CEA in adults with carotid stenosis were included. Study quality was evaluated using the NHLBI Study Quality Assessment Tools. Due to substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity, a quantitative synthesis was not performed. RESULTS: Four prospective observational studies were included, involving 95 patients with predominantly severe carotid stenosis (≥ 70%), with one cohort applying a ≥ 60% threshold. Electrophysiological findings were heterogeneous: VEP parameters generally showed no consistent postoperative improvement, whereas ERG demonstrated significant enhancement of oscillatory potentials and a-/b-waves amplitudes in 3 of the 4 included studies. Visual field indices improved in several cohorts, while structural parameters, particularly retinal nerve fiber layer thickness, remained stable. Changes in intraocular pressure were inconsistently reported. Overall methodological quality indicated a moderate-to-high risk of bias, primarily due to small sample sizes, lack of adjustment for confounders, and variability in electrophysiological protocols. CONCLUSION: The available evidence, while preliminary and exploratory, suggests a possible association between CEA and postoperative changes in electrophysiological parameters, most notably ERG-derived measures. These findings should be interpreted with considerable caution given the small number of studies, limited sample sizes, and substantial methodological heterogeneity. Whether ocular electrophysiology holds clinical utility in the perioperative assessment of carotid disease remains to be established by larger, adequately powered, and standardized prospective studies.

International Journal of Retina and Vitreous
Fernando Pessoa University (PT), Universidade do Porto (PT), Administração Regional de Saúde de Lisboa e Vale do Tejo (PT), CUF Porto Hospital (PT), Hospital de Santo António (PT), Centre for Health Technology and Services Research (PT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.