Perdanakusuma II versus Falanga Score for Chronic Wound Assessment: A Quasi-Experimental Study before and after Structured Training in Surgical Residents

Background: Accurate chronic wound assessment is essential for monitoring healing and guiding clinical management. However, many scoring systems are too complex for routine clinical practice. This study compared the classification accuracy and agreement with an expert reference standard of the Perdanakusuma II and Falanga scoring systems among surgical residents.Methods: A quasi-experimental one-group pretest–posttest study was conducted involving 41 postgraduate year-1-equivalent surgical residents at a tertiary teaching hospital. Participants assessed 20 standardized chronic wound images using both scoring systems before and after structured training. Classification accuracy was compared with expert consensus classifications. Agreement with reference scores was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2), while scoring deviation was assessed using mean absolute error (MAE). Paired comparisons were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.Results: Both scoring systems demonstrated significant improvement after training (P<0.001). Mean accuracy increased from 41.71%±12.48% to 54.02%±10.62% for the Falanga score and from 56.59%±13.62% to 67.44%±13.56% for the Perdanakusuma II score. The Perdanakusuma II score showed higher accuracy than the Falanga score in both pretest and posttest assessments (P<0.001). Agreement with the reference standard was also consistently higher for the Perdanakusuma II score before and after training (ICC2=0.73 and 0.76) than for the Falanga score (ICC2=0.39 and 0.62). MAE values were consistently lower for the Perdanakusuma II score.Conclusion: Both scoring systems demonstrated improved performance following structured training. However, the Perdanakusuma II score showed higher accuracy, stronger agreement with the reference standard, and lower scoring deviation, supporting its potential utility for surgical training and routine clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Wound Management and Research
Published
2026-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22467/jwmr.2026.03643
Primary Topic
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perdanakusuma II versus Falanga Score for Chronic Wound Assessment: A Quasi-Experimental Study before and after Structured Training in Surgical Residents

David Sontani Perdanakusuma, Hanif Ardiansyah Sulistya, A S Budi, Inggrid Ayusari Asali
Journal of Wound Management and Research
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
article

Perdanakusuma II versus Falanga Score for Chronic Wound Assessment: A Quasi-Experimental Study before and after Structured Training in Surgical Residents

David Sontani Perdanakusuma, Hanif Ardiansyah Sulistya, A S Budi, Inggrid Ayusari Asali
article en

Abstract

Background: Accurate chronic wound assessment is essential for monitoring healing and guiding clinical management. However, many scoring systems are too complex for routine clinical practice. This study compared the classification accuracy and agreement with an expert reference standard of the Perdanakusuma II and Falanga scoring systems among surgical residents.Methods: A quasi-experimental one-group pretest–posttest study was conducted involving 41 postgraduate year-1-equivalent surgical residents at a tertiary teaching hospital. Participants assessed 20 standardized chronic wound images using both scoring systems before and after structured training. Classification accuracy was compared with expert consensus classifications. Agreement with reference scores was evaluated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC2), while scoring deviation was assessed using mean absolute error (MAE). Paired comparisons were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.Results: Both scoring systems demonstrated significant improvement after training (P<0.001). Mean accuracy increased from 41.71%±12.48% to 54.02%±10.62% for the Falanga score and from 56.59%±13.62% to 67.44%±13.56% for the Perdanakusuma II score. The Perdanakusuma II score showed higher accuracy than the Falanga score in both pretest and posttest assessments (P<0.001). Agreement with the reference standard was also consistently higher for the Perdanakusuma II score before and after training (ICC2=0.73 and 0.76) than for the Falanga score (ICC2=0.39 and 0.62). MAE values were consistently lower for the Perdanakusuma II score.Conclusion: Both scoring systems demonstrated improved performance following structured training. However, the Perdanakusuma II score showed higher accuracy, stronger agreement with the reference standard, and lower scoring deviation, supporting its potential utility for surgical training and routine clinical application.

Journal of Wound Management and ResearchVol. 22(2)
Universitas Airlangga (ID), Institut Sains dan Teknologi Terpadu Surabaya (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.