Decoding glioblastoma evolution and heterogeneity through mechanistic modeling: implications for clinical translation

Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most aggressive and lethal primary brain tumors in adults, characterized by dynamic clonal evolution and extensive genomic, cellular, spatial, and microenvironmental heterogeneity. Multi-omics studies have revealed that GBM follows complex evolutionary trajectories involving genetic, epigenetic, transcriptional, and immune-microenvironmental remodeling as tumors grow, adapt to the brain microenvironment, and acquire therapeutic resistance. Increasing evidence suggests that GBM may originate from aberrant neural stem or progenitor cells, including those residing in the subventricular zone, and that glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) contribute to tumor propagation, heterogeneity, and recurrence. A key conceptual challenge is to reconcile hierarchical cancer stem cell models, in which GSCs are viewed as relatively stable tumor-propagating subpopulations, with dynamic state plasticity models, in which stem-like properties can be reversibly acquired or lost during transitions among proneural-like, mesenchymal-like, invasive, and therapy-tolerant states. Recent advances in single-cell profiling, spatial transcriptomics, lineage tracing, organoid culture, 3D bioprinting, genetically engineered models, and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted computational modeling have substantially improved the ability to study these processes. However, no currently available model fully recapitulates human GBM heterogeneity, recurrence, treatment history, and tumor-microenvironment interactions. Therefore, model selection should be guided by clearly defined mechanistic questions rather than by reliance on any single platform. This review summarizes current advances in in vitro, ex vivo, in vivo, and computational models for studying GBM evolution and heterogeneity, and discusses how integrated model pipelines may improve preclinical drug testing, treatment-response prediction, and precision neuro-oncology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13046-026-03767-7
Primary Topic
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decoding glioblastoma evolution and heterogeneity through mechanistic modeling: implications for clinical translation

Weidong Zhao, Haowu Jiang, Hui Zhou, Rui Sun
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Decoding glioblastoma evolution and heterogeneity through mechanistic modeling: implications for clinical translation

Weidong Zhao, Haowu Jiang, Hui Zhou, Rui Sun
article en

Abstract

Glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most aggressive and lethal primary brain tumors in adults, characterized by dynamic clonal evolution and extensive genomic, cellular, spatial, and microenvironmental heterogeneity. Multi-omics studies have revealed that GBM follows complex evolutionary trajectories involving genetic, epigenetic, transcriptional, and immune-microenvironmental remodeling as tumors grow, adapt to the brain microenvironment, and acquire therapeutic resistance. Increasing evidence suggests that GBM may originate from aberrant neural stem or progenitor cells, including those residing in the subventricular zone, and that glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs) contribute to tumor propagation, heterogeneity, and recurrence. A key conceptual challenge is to reconcile hierarchical cancer stem cell models, in which GSCs are viewed as relatively stable tumor-propagating subpopulations, with dynamic state plasticity models, in which stem-like properties can be reversibly acquired or lost during transitions among proneural-like, mesenchymal-like, invasive, and therapy-tolerant states. Recent advances in single-cell profiling, spatial transcriptomics, lineage tracing, organoid culture, 3D bioprinting, genetically engineered models, and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted computational modeling have substantially improved the ability to study these processes. However, no currently available model fully recapitulates human GBM heterogeneity, recurrence, treatment history, and tumor-microenvironment interactions. Therefore, model selection should be guided by clearly defined mechanistic questions rather than by reliance on any single platform. This review summarizes current advances in in vitro, ex vivo, in vivo, and computational models for studying GBM evolution and heterogeneity, and discusses how integrated model pipelines may improve preclinical drug testing, treatment-response prediction, and precision neuro-oncology.

Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Anhui Medical University (CN), Hefei National Center for Physical Sciences at Nanoscale (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Anhui Medical University, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.