Comparative multi-criteria assessment of electro-fuel-based marine power systems for container ships

The decarbonization of deep-sea shipping requires alternative marine power systems capable of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions while maintaining economic viability and ensuring compliance with evolving IMO regulations. This study presents an integrated assessment of electro-fuel-based retrofit power systems for a deep-sea container ship, combining high-fidelity dynamic energy modelling, life-cycle environmental assessment, techno-economic analysis, IMO regulatory compliance assessment, multi-criteria decision analysis, and uncertainty quantification. Six retrofit configurations, comprising e-ammonia, e-methanol, and e-liquid hydrogen in dual-fuel engine and proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) systems, are evaluated against a conventional diesel baseline using a real operational profile. Dynamic energy analysis reveals that ammonia cracking and methanol steam reforming reduce PEMFC efficiency by 3–9 % relative to direct hydrogen operation, substantially reducing the efficiency advantage of hydrogen-carrier fuels. The hydrogen PEMFC system achieves the lowest energy consumption, with a 16.3 % reduction and an 88.4 % lifecycle GHG reduction, while attaining the lowest greenhouse gas fuel intensity (GFI) of 9.99 gCO 2 eq/MJ. The ammonia dual-fuel engine provides the most cost-effective retrofit, with a marginal abatement cost of 254 $/tCO 2 eq and the lowest regulatory-adjusted total annual cost under uncertainty analysis. All retrofit configurations comply with adopted IMO GFI targets through 2040, whereas only hydrogen-based systems approach the projected 2050 net-zero trajectory. The results demonstrate that no single retrofit pathway is universally optimal: hydrogen PEMFC systems maximize environmental and long-term regulatory performance, ammonia dual-fuel engines currently provide the most economically attractive transition pathway, and methanol-based systems providing an intermediate compromise between these objectives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energy Conversion and Management
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2026.121836
Primary Topic
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative multi-criteria assessment of electro-fuel-based marine power systems for container ships

Ahmed G. Elkafas, Iraklis Lazakis
Energy Conversion and Management
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
article

Comparative multi-criteria assessment of electro-fuel-based marine power systems for container ships

Ahmed G. Elkafas, Iraklis Lazakis
article en

Abstract

The decarbonization of deep-sea shipping requires alternative marine power systems capable of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions while maintaining economic viability and ensuring compliance with evolving IMO regulations. This study presents an integrated assessment of electro-fuel-based retrofit power systems for a deep-sea container ship, combining high-fidelity dynamic energy modelling, life-cycle environmental assessment, techno-economic analysis, IMO regulatory compliance assessment, multi-criteria decision analysis, and uncertainty quantification. Six retrofit configurations, comprising e-ammonia, e-methanol, and e-liquid hydrogen in dual-fuel engine and proton exchange membrane fuel cell (PEMFC) systems, are evaluated against a conventional diesel baseline using a real operational profile. Dynamic energy analysis reveals that ammonia cracking and methanol steam reforming reduce PEMFC efficiency by 3–9 % relative to direct hydrogen operation, substantially reducing the efficiency advantage of hydrogen-carrier fuels. The hydrogen PEMFC system achieves the lowest energy consumption, with a 16.3 % reduction and an 88.4 % lifecycle GHG reduction, while attaining the lowest greenhouse gas fuel intensity (GFI) of 9.99 gCO 2 eq/MJ. The ammonia dual-fuel engine provides the most cost-effective retrofit, with a marginal abatement cost of 254 $/tCO 2 eq and the lowest regulatory-adjusted total annual cost under uncertainty analysis. All retrofit configurations comply with adopted IMO GFI targets through 2040, whereas only hydrogen-based systems approach the projected 2050 net-zero trajectory. The results demonstrate that no single retrofit pathway is universally optimal: hydrogen PEMFC systems maximize environmental and long-term regulatory performance, ammonia dual-fuel engines currently provide the most economically attractive transition pathway, and methanol-based systems providing an intermediate compromise between these objectives.

Energy Conversion and ManagementVol. 366
University of Strathclyde (GB), Alexandria University (EG)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.