Comparison of Strain Rate Sensitivity between As-Built and Stress-Relief Annealed Additively Manufactured 316L Stainless Steel

ABSTRACT The strain rate sensitivity of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel is compared between material in the as-built condition and after being subjected to a stress-relief anneal. The mechanical properties are assessed using tensile testing at strain rates spanning the orders of 10−3–103 s−1, utilizing a hydraulic load frame for low-rate tests and a tensile split-Hopkinson bar apparatus for the dynamic tests. The rate sensitivity is quantified using three different parameters: the Johnson-Cook c parameter, the rate sensitivity parameter m which relates the change in flow stress to the strain rate using an exponential function, and the rate sensitivity parameter β that is related to the material activation volume. Optical microscopy and X-ray diffraction measurements indicate that the dislocation motion because of the thermal activation energy from the annealing process results in an increase in the sub-grain crystallite size as the dislocations are rearranged. This causes an increased rate sensitivity in the material after the stress-relief annealing process. In the as-built condition, the material exhibits strain rate sensitivity parameters of c=0.022, m=0.018, and β=11.6 MPa, whereas after stress-relief annealing, these parameters increase to c=0.028, m=0.025, and β=12.1 MPa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1520/jte20250426
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Strain Rate Sensitivity between As-Built and Stress-Relief Annealed Additively Manufactured 316L Stainless Steel

Nathan Spulak, Judy Schneider, Terrell Elias Marler, Lawson King
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

Comparison of Strain Rate Sensitivity between As-Built and Stress-Relief Annealed Additively Manufactured 316L Stainless Steel

Nathan Spulak, Judy Schneider, Terrell Elias Marler, Lawson King
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The strain rate sensitivity of additively manufactured 316L stainless steel is compared between material in the as-built condition and after being subjected to a stress-relief anneal. The mechanical properties are assessed using tensile testing at strain rates spanning the orders of 10−3–103 s−1, utilizing a hydraulic load frame for low-rate tests and a tensile split-Hopkinson bar apparatus for the dynamic tests. The rate sensitivity is quantified using three different parameters: the Johnson-Cook c parameter, the rate sensitivity parameter m which relates the change in flow stress to the strain rate using an exponential function, and the rate sensitivity parameter β that is related to the material activation volume. Optical microscopy and X-ray diffraction measurements indicate that the dislocation motion because of the thermal activation energy from the annealing process results in an increase in the sub-grain crystallite size as the dislocations are rearranged. This causes an increased rate sensitivity in the material after the stress-relief annealing process. In the as-built condition, the material exhibits strain rate sensitivity parameters of c=0.022, m=0.018, and β=11.6 MPa, whereas after stress-relief annealing, these parameters increase to c=0.028, m=0.025, and β=12.1 MPa.

Journal of Testing and Evaluation
University of Alabama in Huntsville (US)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparison of Strain Rate Sensitivity between As-Built and Stress-Relief Annealed Additively Manufactured 316L Stainless Steel — Nathan Spulak, Judy Schneider, et al. · Journal of Testing and Evaluation (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS