A Review of Internal Structures in Additively Manufactured Turbomachinery Blades: Classification and Effects on Key Blade Characteristics

Additive manufacturing has become an important technology for turbomachinery blades because it enables lightweight components of high geometric complexity and allows the external shell and internal infill to be designed separately. However, published studies on blade internal structures remain fragmented because different works consider different cell types, materials, optimization formulations, and evaluation criteria, which complicates cross-study comparison. This review synthesizes 47 sources and classifies internal structures according to the method of geometric definition, distinguishing 2D parametric structures (class A1), 3D parametric strut-based and TPMS-based structures (class A2), free-topology structures obtained by topology optimization or generative design (class B), and hybrid structures combining parametric infill with free topology (class AB). Comparative analysis based on normalized data extracted from 17 studies is used to examine the effects of these structure classes on natural frequencies, stress state, thermal state, and fatigue life. The review is complemented by a structured study-by-study summary, which systematizes the studies used in the review discussion in terms of component type, material, additive-manufacturing process, internal-structure class, analysis method, investigated indicators, main results, and limitations. The available evidence indicates that class A1 structures are used mainly for mass reduction in narrow internal cavities, class B structures are especially effective for targeted material redistribution and often provide the largest increase in lower natural frequencies, whereas TPMS-based structures appear particularly promising for thermal-state-related applications. At the same time, fatigue life and manufacturing accuracy remain among the least studied and least experimentally validated characteristics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp10070225
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Review of Internal Structures in Additively Manufactured Turbomachinery Blades: Classification and Effects on Key Blade Characteristics

Л. В. Плотников, Viacheslav Sedunin, Igor Melikhov
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
article

A Review of Internal Structures in Additively Manufactured Turbomachinery Blades: Classification and Effects on Key Blade Characteristics

Л. В. Плотников, Viacheslav Sedunin, Igor Melikhov
article en

Abstract

Additive manufacturing has become an important technology for turbomachinery blades because it enables lightweight components of high geometric complexity and allows the external shell and internal infill to be designed separately. However, published studies on blade internal structures remain fragmented because different works consider different cell types, materials, optimization formulations, and evaluation criteria, which complicates cross-study comparison. This review synthesizes 47 sources and classifies internal structures according to the method of geometric definition, distinguishing 2D parametric structures (class A1), 3D parametric strut-based and TPMS-based structures (class A2), free-topology structures obtained by topology optimization or generative design (class B), and hybrid structures combining parametric infill with free topology (class AB). Comparative analysis based on normalized data extracted from 17 studies is used to examine the effects of these structure classes on natural frequencies, stress state, thermal state, and fatigue life. The review is complemented by a structured study-by-study summary, which systematizes the studies used in the review discussion in terms of component type, material, additive-manufacturing process, internal-structure class, analysis method, investigated indicators, main results, and limitations. The available evidence indicates that class A1 structures are used mainly for mass reduction in narrow internal cavities, class B structures are especially effective for targeted material redistribution and often provide the largest increase in lower natural frequencies, whereas TPMS-based structures appear particularly promising for thermal-state-related applications. At the same time, fatigue life and manufacturing accuracy remain among the least studied and least experimentally validated characteristics.

Journal of Manufacturing and Materials ProcessingVol. 10(7)
Ural Federal University (RU), University of Cambridge (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.