Endoscopic management and determinants of success in upper gastrointestinal foreign bodies

Purpose: This study aims to analyze patients with foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract and evaluate endoscopic treatment modalities and clinical outcomes.Materials and Methods: Patients with upper gastrointestinal foreign bodies who underwent emergency flexible endoscopy at Adana City Hospital between September 2017 and December 2024 were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic data, clinical presentations, type and localization of foreign bodies, endoscopic treatment, and outcomes were assessed.Results: A total of 127 patients were included. Foreign bodies were most frequently localized in the esophagus (n=76, 59.8%), with proximal esophageal impaction in 44 cases (57.9%). The most commonly used endoscopic retrieval device was alligator/rat-tooth forceps (n=57, 44.9%). The mean time to endoscopy was 2.3 hours (range: 1–8 hours). Endoscopic removal was successful in 116 patients (91.3%). The most important factor affecting endoscopic success was the type of foreign body; the endoscopic success rate was 97.5% for soft foreign bodies, and the difference between soft and plastic foreign bodies was statistically significant. Conclusion: Endoscopic methods are highly effective and safe for the removal of upper gastrointestinal foreign bodies, with a 91.3% success rate. The most important determinants of endoscopic success were the type of foreign body and the chosen endoscopic technique.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Çukurova medical journal (Online)/Çukurova medical journal
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.1886043
Primary Topic
Foreign Body Medical Cases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endoscopic management and determinants of success in upper gastrointestinal foreign bodies

Mustafa Harı, Bünyamin Sarıtaşž, Çağatay Çavuşoğlu, Şehmus Ölmez et al.
Çukurova medical journal (Online)/Çukurova medical journal
Foreign Body Medical Cases
article

Endoscopic management and determinants of success in upper gastrointestinal foreign bodies

Mustafa Harı, Bünyamin Sarıtaşž, Çağatay Çavuşoğlu, Şehmus Ölmez, Abdullah İlhan, Halil Çapar, Deha Çetin, Mert Akyıldız, Fatime Demir
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to analyze patients with foreign bodies in the upper gastrointestinal tract and evaluate endoscopic treatment modalities and clinical outcomes.Materials and Methods: Patients with upper gastrointestinal foreign bodies who underwent emergency flexible endoscopy at Adana City Hospital between September 2017 and December 2024 were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic data, clinical presentations, type and localization of foreign bodies, endoscopic treatment, and outcomes were assessed.Results: A total of 127 patients were included. Foreign bodies were most frequently localized in the esophagus (n=76, 59.8%), with proximal esophageal impaction in 44 cases (57.9%). The most commonly used endoscopic retrieval device was alligator/rat-tooth forceps (n=57, 44.9%). The mean time to endoscopy was 2.3 hours (range: 1–8 hours). Endoscopic removal was successful in 116 patients (91.3%). The most important factor affecting endoscopic success was the type of foreign body; the endoscopic success rate was 97.5% for soft foreign bodies, and the difference between soft and plastic foreign bodies was statistically significant. Conclusion: Endoscopic methods are highly effective and safe for the removal of upper gastrointestinal foreign bodies, with a 91.3% success rate. The most important determinants of endoscopic success were the type of foreign body and the chosen endoscopic technique.

Çukurova medical journal (Online)/Çukurova medical journalVol. 51(2)
Şanlıurfa Mehmet Akif İnan Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), Rize Devlet Hastanesi (TR), University of Health Sciences (SO)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Foreign Body Medical Cases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.