Clinical outcomes of peroneus longus tendon and contralateral hamstring tendon autografts in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) performed with ipsilateral peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft or contralateral hamstring tendon (HT) autograft.Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic revision ACLR between 2019 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. After applying the exclusion criteria, 32 patients were included: 14 treated with PLT autograft and 18 with contralateral HT autograft. Demographic data, graft diameter, time to return to daily activities, return to sports, Lachman grade, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, donor-site ankle function, and complications were evaluated. Results: PLT group had a larger graft diameter than the contralateral HT group (8.9 ± 0.8 mm vs 7.9 ± 0.5 mm). Final Lysholm and IKDC scores were similar between groups (84.4 ± 6.5 vs 81.7 ± 8.1 and 81.4 ± 7.7 vs 79.9 ± 8.3, respectively), and both groups showed clear improvement from baseline. Time to return to daily activities was also similar (4.3 ± 1.3 months vs 4.2 ± 1.2 months), and return to sports was achieved in 57.1% of the PLT group and 55.6% of the contralateral HT group. Conclusion: PLT autograft showed short-term clinical and functional outcomes similar to those observed with contralateral HT autograft in revision ACLR, while providing a larger graft diameter with clinically acceptable donor-site morbidity.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Çukurova medical journal (Online)/Çukurova medical journal
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17826/cumj.1933921
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical outcomes of peroneus longus tendon and contralateral hamstring tendon autografts in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

İdris Demirtaş, Öner Kılınç
Çukurova medical journal (Online)/Çukurova medical journal
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
article

Clinical outcomes of peroneus longus tendon and contralateral hamstring tendon autografts in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

İdris Demirtaş, Öner Kılınç
article en

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the clinical and functional outcomes of revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) performed with ipsilateral peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft or contralateral hamstring tendon (HT) autograft.Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic revision ACLR between 2019 and 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. After applying the exclusion criteria, 32 patients were included: 14 treated with PLT autograft and 18 with contralateral HT autograft. Demographic data, graft diameter, time to return to daily activities, return to sports, Lachman grade, Lysholm score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, donor-site ankle function, and complications were evaluated. Results: PLT group had a larger graft diameter than the contralateral HT group (8.9 ± 0.8 mm vs 7.9 ± 0.5 mm). Final Lysholm and IKDC scores were similar between groups (84.4 ± 6.5 vs 81.7 ± 8.1 and 81.4 ± 7.7 vs 79.9 ± 8.3, respectively), and both groups showed clear improvement from baseline. Time to return to daily activities was also similar (4.3 ± 1.3 months vs 4.2 ± 1.2 months), and return to sports was achieved in 57.1% of the PLT group and 55.6% of the contralateral HT group. Conclusion: PLT autograft showed short-term clinical and functional outcomes similar to those observed with contralateral HT autograft in revision ACLR, while providing a larger graft diameter with clinically acceptable donor-site morbidity.

Çukurova medical journal (Online)/Çukurova medical journalVol. 51(2)
Mersin Üniversitesi
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.