Structural Closure of Leptonic Magnetic Anomalies in the dBBZ Model , Comparaison with QED ( Old Ghosts or New Skeletons )

The magnetic anomalies of charged leptons represent one of the most precise tests of QED and of the Standard Model.In the standard formulation, the magnetic anomaly of the electron and of the muon is calculated through a perturbative succession of contributions associated with classes of Feynman diagrams, with virtual photons, leptonic loops, hadronic and electroweak contributions.In this work, a different physical organization of the problem is proposed, based on the dBBZ model, in which charged leptons are not treated as pointlike particles, but as extended configurations consisting of internal entangled orbitals.In the case of the electron, the dBBZ contribution of the i-th orbital to the magnetic anomaly is written in the form:ai = Ci*Yi*Sqrt(2*Ki)/(2*Pi)The resulting succession is positive, rapidly decreasing and cumulative, in clear contrast with the alternating perturbative succession of QED.Using the same value of the fine-structure constant adopted in the QED comparison, dBBZ provides for the electronic anomaly a relative deviation of order 10^-10, competitive with respect to the complete QED/SM reference value considered.The analysis is then extended to the muon.In the dBBZ model, also the magnetic anomaly of the muon is calculated by means of the same orbital-structural methodology employed for the electron, although with more complex energy balances and weak constraints.The raw weak constants are preliminarily obtained from a two-loop running with an effective approximation of the third loop, but are then refined through the structural parameters dw and iw, simultaneously imposing mass, magnetic anomaly and decay time.It is also shown that the refinement of the weak coupling constants, specific for each orbital, possesses a significant parametric redundancy.For the first term, where the exponential is unitary, a variation of the raw value of the corresponding constant can be compensated by a transformation of the structural parameter dw.It follows that the raw weak value and the closure parameter are not independently observable in the final refined value.Since it contains information coming from perturbative weak running, this result suggests that part of the role attributed in the standard scheme to virtual contributions may be reinterpreted, in dBBZ, as parametric redundancy reabsorbed by structural closure.The work does not intend to deny the computational success of QED, but to propose a different physical reading of the corrective hierarchy: not necessarily old virtual ghosts, but perhaps new structural skeletons.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21029833
Primary Topic
Computational Physics and Python Applications
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Structural Closure of Leptonic Magnetic Anomalies in the dBBZ Model , Comparaison with QED ( Old Ghosts or New Skeletons )

Lino Zamboni
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Computational Physics and Python Applications
preprint

Structural Closure of Leptonic Magnetic Anomalies in the dBBZ Model , Comparaison with QED ( Old Ghosts or New Skeletons )

Lino Zamboni
preprint en

Abstract

The magnetic anomalies of charged leptons represent one of the most precise tests of QED and of the Standard Model.In the standard formulation, the magnetic anomaly of the electron and of the muon is calculated through a perturbative succession of contributions associated with classes of Feynman diagrams, with virtual photons, leptonic loops, hadronic and electroweak contributions.In this work, a different physical organization of the problem is proposed, based on the dBBZ model, in which charged leptons are not treated as pointlike particles, but as extended configurations consisting of internal entangled orbitals.In the case of the electron, the dBBZ contribution of the i-th orbital to the magnetic anomaly is written in the form:ai = Ci*Yi*Sqrt(2*Ki)/(2*Pi)The resulting succession is positive, rapidly decreasing and cumulative, in clear contrast with the alternating perturbative succession of QED.Using the same value of the fine-structure constant adopted in the QED comparison, dBBZ provides for the electronic anomaly a relative deviation of order 10^-10, competitive with respect to the complete QED/SM reference value considered.The analysis is then extended to the muon.In the dBBZ model, also the magnetic anomaly of the muon is calculated by means of the same orbital-structural methodology employed for the electron, although with more complex energy balances and weak constraints.The raw weak constants are preliminarily obtained from a two-loop running with an effective approximation of the third loop, but are then refined through the structural parameters dw and iw, simultaneously imposing mass, magnetic anomaly and decay time.It is also shown that the refinement of the weak coupling constants, specific for each orbital, possesses a significant parametric redundancy.For the first term, where the exponential is unitary, a variation of the raw value of the corresponding constant can be compensated by a transformation of the structural parameter dw.It follows that the raw weak value and the closure parameter are not independently observable in the final refined value.Since it contains information coming from perturbative weak running, this result suggests that part of the role attributed in the standard scheme to virtual contributions may be reinterpreted, in dBBZ, as parametric redundancy reabsorbed by structural closure.The work does not intend to deny the computational success of QED, but to propose a different physical reading of the corrective hierarchy: not necessarily old virtual ghosts, but perhaps new structural skeletons.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Computational Physics and Python Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.