Climate agreement-making across negotiation and non-negotiation spaces: how states participate in the UN climate negotiations

Abstract Participation in multilateral negotiations such as those on climate change is key to understanding negotiation processes and outcomes. Despite its importance, participation – what negotiators actually do – remains understudied and ill understood. We address this gap by examining participation in UN climate negotiations. Specifically, we collect data across all 198 Parties and 58 negotiation sessions (subsidiary body meetings, SBs, and Conferences of the Parties, COPs) since 1995 on a total of six activities across both negotiation and non-negotiation spaces: oral interventions, written submissions, and services as chairs for negotiation activities; and press conferences, side events, and exhibits for non-negotiation spaces. Our analysis shows that participation spans different spaces, even if negotiations dominate. Nevertheless, non-negotiation spaces are growing in importance, with COP15 serving as a turning point. Non-negotiation spaces complement negotiations: Parties active in negotiations also tend to pursue non-negotiation spaces. Finally, Parties differ strongly in the extent to which they engage, with many Parties remaining relatively passive, sometimes despite a continuous presence at negotiation sessions. These observations already help to understand UN climate negotiations better, but invite further work, including more qualitative research – for which our data can provide a helpful starting point.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-026-09730-3
Primary Topic
Conflict Management and Negotiation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Climate agreement-making across negotiation and non-negotiation spaces: how states participate in the UN climate negotiations

Carola Klöck, Paula Castro, Silvana Târlea, Sarah Tegas
International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics
Conflict Management and Negotiation
article

Climate agreement-making across negotiation and non-negotiation spaces: how states participate in the UN climate negotiations

Carola Klöck, Paula Castro, Silvana Târlea, Sarah Tegas
article en

Abstract

Abstract Participation in multilateral negotiations such as those on climate change is key to understanding negotiation processes and outcomes. Despite its importance, participation – what negotiators actually do – remains understudied and ill understood. We address this gap by examining participation in UN climate negotiations. Specifically, we collect data across all 198 Parties and 58 negotiation sessions (subsidiary body meetings, SBs, and Conferences of the Parties, COPs) since 1995 on a total of six activities across both negotiation and non-negotiation spaces: oral interventions, written submissions, and services as chairs for negotiation activities; and press conferences, side events, and exhibits for non-negotiation spaces. Our analysis shows that participation spans different spaces, even if negotiations dominate. Nevertheless, non-negotiation spaces are growing in importance, with COP15 serving as a turning point. Non-negotiation spaces complement negotiations: Parties active in negotiations also tend to pursue non-negotiation spaces. Finally, Parties differ strongly in the extent to which they engage, with many Parties remaining relatively passive, sometimes despite a continuous presence at negotiation sessions. These observations already help to understand UN climate negotiations better, but invite further work, including more qualitative research – for which our data can provide a helpful starting point.

International Environmental Agreements Politics Law and Economics
University of Zurich (CH), Institut d'Etudes Politiques de Paris (FR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Conflict Management and Negotiation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.