Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering

The impact of target prevalence (the proportion of trials in which a target appears) has been widely studied within visual search. The low prevalence effect is the finding that rare targets are often missed. Mind wandering, where one's attention drifts away from a primary goal, impairs performance across various tasks, but its influence in low-prevalence search remains unclear. We recruited 60 participants from the general population and examined their mind-wandering rates as they searched for either low- (10%) or high- (50%) prevalence targets. When participants were engaged in mind wandering, response accuracy was reduced and target-absent response times increased. Low-prevalence targets were missed more than high-prevalence targets, but to our surprise, we discovered that most of the low-prevalence effect could be attributed to mind wandering in the majority our analyses. This marks a substantial shift in our understanding of the prevalence effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Attention Perception & Psychophysics
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-026-03296-7
Primary Topic
Mind wandering and attention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering

H. J. Godwin, Michael C. Hout, Haden Dewis, Lois Howsley et al.
Attention Perception & Psychophysics
Mind wandering and attention
article

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering

H. J. Godwin, Michael C. Hout, Haden Dewis, Lois Howsley, Joseph W. Houpt
article en

Abstract

The impact of target prevalence (the proportion of trials in which a target appears) has been widely studied within visual search. The low prevalence effect is the finding that rare targets are often missed. Mind wandering, where one's attention drifts away from a primary goal, impairs performance across various tasks, but its influence in low-prevalence search remains unclear. We recruited 60 participants from the general population and examined their mind-wandering rates as they searched for either low- (10%) or high- (50%) prevalence targets. When participants were engaged in mind wandering, response accuracy was reduced and target-absent response times increased. Low-prevalence targets were missed more than high-prevalence targets, but to our surprise, we discovered that most of the low-prevalence effect could be attributed to mind wandering in the majority our analyses. This marks a substantial shift in our understanding of the prevalence effect.

Attention Perception & PsychophysicsVol. 88(6)
New Mexico State University (US), University of Southampton (GB), The University of Texas at San Antonio (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Mind wandering and attention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering — H. J. Godwin, Michael C. Hout, et al. · Attention Perception & Psychophysics (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS