‘Maritime regulations crossroads: bridging IMO’s CII and EU ETS through the EUA efficiency indicator’

In order to reduce shipping Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions, both global and regional regulatory frameworks have been developed by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) and the European Union (EU) respectively. The purpose of this study is to identify the relationship among these regulatory frameworks within the shipping industry. In order to facilitate this comparison, the IMO’s Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) and the EU Emission Trading System (ETS) are analyzed in order to identify similarities, differences and examine if a correlation between the two regulations exists. Voyage data from selected vessels were gathered and analyzed to provide the CII rating of the vessels and EU ETS costs associated with the respective voyages. Building on these cases’ results, a new indicator – the EUA Efficiency Indicator − was developed to estimate the accumulative result of the co-existence of the two regulations and determine the prevailing combined mechanism of global and regional decarbonization initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2026.102126
Primary Topic
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

‘Maritime regulations crossroads: bridging IMO’s CII and EU ETS through the EUA efficiency indicator’

Anastasia Christodoulou, Jason Kontochristos
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
article

‘Maritime regulations crossroads: bridging IMO’s CII and EU ETS through the EUA efficiency indicator’

Anastasia Christodoulou, Jason Kontochristos
article en

Abstract

In order to reduce shipping Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions, both global and regional regulatory frameworks have been developed by the International Maritime Organisation (IMO) and the European Union (EU) respectively. The purpose of this study is to identify the relationship among these regulatory frameworks within the shipping industry. In order to facilitate this comparison, the IMO’s Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) and the EU Emission Trading System (ETS) are analyzed in order to identify similarities, differences and examine if a correlation between the two regulations exists. Voyage data from selected vessels were gathered and analyzed to provide the CII rating of the vessels and EU ETS costs associated with the respective voyages. Building on these cases’ results, a new indicator – the EUA Efficiency Indicator − was developed to estimate the accumulative result of the co-existence of the two regulations and determine the prevailing combined mechanism of global and regional decarbonization initiatives.

Transportation Research Interdisciplinary PerspectivesVol. 38
University of Piraeus (GR), Lloyd's (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

‘Maritime regulations crossroads: bridging IMO’s CII and EU ETS through the EUA efficiency indicator’ — Anastasia Christodoulou, Jason Kontochristos · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS