Leveraging Real-World Evidence to Inform Regulatory, Clinical, and Coverage Decisions Related to Glucagon-Like Peptide-1–Based Therapies: Synopsis of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have transformed obesity and diabetes management, with rapidly expanding indications and use among U.S. adults. Despite their promise, key questions remain about optimal treatment pathways, long-term safety, effectiveness across diverse populations, adherence, and economic impact. Real-world evidence (RWE) derived from electronic health records, claims, and other data sources could address these gaps, but unique challenges complicate its use, such as inconsistent insurance coverage, high discontinuation rates, medication shortages, compounded formulations, and off-label prescribing. To explore these issues, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases convened a workshop in May 2025 with experts from regulatory agencies, guideline committees, payers, and academia. Discussions focused on identifying knowledge gaps in GLP-1RA use, evaluating how RWE informs practice, assessing limitations of real-world data, and strategies to reduce bias in RWE. Presentations emphasized RWE's potential to complement randomized trials by capturing rare adverse events, long-term outcomes, and effectiveness in routine care. However, persistent challenges include data reliability, confounding, and incomplete capture of medication use and outcomes, particularly in pediatric and underserved populations. Coverage decisions remain heterogeneous across Medicare, Medicaid, and private payers and across time, underscoring the need for rigorous cost-benefit analyses. The workshop concluded that robust RWE is essential for developing value-based coverage policies and optimizing GLP-1RA use. Continued investment in high-quality data infrastructure and analytic methods will be critical to inform regulatory, clinical, and economic decisions as utilization expands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Internal Medicine
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7326/annals-25-05468
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Diabetes Treatment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Leveraging Real-World Evidence to Inform Regulatory, Clinical, and Coverage Decisions Related to Glucagon-Like Peptide-1–Based Therapies: Synopsis of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop

Kimberly Danae Cauley Narain, Craig M. Hales, Christina C. Wee, Noelia Duchovny et al.
1 citations
Annals of Internal Medicine
Diabetes Treatment and Management
9.26
article

Leveraging Real-World Evidence to Inform Regulatory, Clinical, and Coverage Decisions Related to Glucagon-Like Peptide-1–Based Therapies: Synopsis of a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Workshop

Kimberly Danae Cauley Narain, Craig M. Hales, Christina C. Wee, Noelia Duchovny, Marie C. Bradley, Sengwee Toh, Davene R. Wright, David Hines, Lesley H. Curtis, John B. Wong, Anand Parekh, David Arterburn, D D’Alessio, Stavroula K. Osganian, Asheley Skinner
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have transformed obesity and diabetes management, with rapidly expanding indications and use among U.S. adults. Despite their promise, key questions remain about optimal treatment pathways, long-term safety, effectiveness across diverse populations, adherence, and economic impact. Real-world evidence (RWE) derived from electronic health records, claims, and other data sources could address these gaps, but unique challenges complicate its use, such as inconsistent insurance coverage, high discontinuation rates, medication shortages, compounded formulations, and off-label prescribing. To explore these issues, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases convened a workshop in May 2025 with experts from regulatory agencies, guideline committees, payers, and academia. Discussions focused on identifying knowledge gaps in GLP-1RA use, evaluating how RWE informs practice, assessing limitations of real-world data, and strategies to reduce bias in RWE. Presentations emphasized RWE's potential to complement randomized trials by capturing rare adverse events, long-term outcomes, and effectiveness in routine care. However, persistent challenges include data reliability, confounding, and incomplete capture of medication use and outcomes, particularly in pediatric and underserved populations. Coverage decisions remain heterogeneous across Medicare, Medicaid, and private payers and across time, underscoring the need for rigorous cost-benefit analyses. The workshop concluded that robust RWE is essential for developing value-based coverage policies and optimizing GLP-1RA use. Continued investment in high-quality data infrastructure and analytic methods will be critical to inform regulatory, clinical, and economic decisions as utilization expands.

Annals of Internal Medicine
Tufts University (US), United States Food and Drug Administration (US), Congressional Budget Office (US), Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US), University of California, Los Angeles (US), Duke University (US), University of Michigan (US), University School of Nashville (US), American College of Physicians (US), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (US), Harvard Pilgrim Health Care (US)
University of Southern California, Kaiser Permanente, National Taiwan University, National Institutes of Health, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Diabetes Treatment and Management
9.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.