Endoscopic management of proximally migrated pancreatic duct stents: A case series of three patients and clinical insights

Pancreatic duct stenting is essential for preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis and treating ductal strictures.[ 1​ ] Proximal stent migration occurs in 5–6% of cases and may lead to severe complications if not promptly retrieved.[ 2​ ] We present three complex cases successfully managed with endoscopic techniques. Case 1 : A 56-year-old man presented with back pain 2 months after ERCP at another hospital, where a straight pancreatic stent (7Fr) had migrated proximally. Pancreatography revealed the stent embedded in a stricture within the pancreatic head. After bougie dilation (7Fr and 8.5Fr), conventional devices failed. The stent was successfully extracted using SpyBite biopsy forceps ([ Video 1 ]). Video 1 Endoscopic management of proximally migrated pancreatic stents in three challenging cases: SpyBite for the stricture, SpyGlass‑guided side‑hole grasping for the branch duct, and minor papilla approach with a perpendicular angle for grasping. Download Video Case 2 : A 59-year-old man developed pancreatitis due to proximal stent migration 4 weeks after ERCP. Retrieval attempts elsewhere had failed. SpyGlass pancreatoscopy showed the stent lodged in a branch duct. Forceps attempts were unsuccessful due to slipping, and precise grasping of the stent's side hole under direct visualization enabled successful retrieval ([ Video 1 ]). Case 3 : A 33-year-old man with incomplete pancreas divisum underwent pancreatic stenting (5Fr). Within 24 hours, the stent migrated into the pancreatic body. Retrieval via the major papilla failed. After cannulating and dilating the minor papilla, foreign body forceps achieved a perpendicular angle for grasping ( Figs . ​​​​​​​ [ 1and ] [ 2 ]). Fig. 1 Endoscopic management of a patient with incomplete pancreas divisum. ( a ) MRCP revealed a reverse α‑type pancreatic duct with incomplete pancreas divisum. ( b ) X‑ray confirms the same anatomy (arrow). ( c ) Pancreatography shows a tortuous, looped ventral duct with mild dilation, angled confluence with the dorsal duct, and irregular narrowing of the accessory duct. ( d ) The minor papilla orifice is stenotic. ( e ) A needle‑knife is used for minor papilla sphincter pre-cut to establish drainage. ( f ) A pancreatic stent is placed via the major papilla to prevent post‑ERCP pancreatitis. Fig. 2 Endoscopic retrieval of a migrated pancreatic stent via the minor papilla in a patient with incomplete pancreas divisum. ( a ) The migrated stent (arrow) in the pancreatic body. ( b ) Minor papilla cannulation. ( c ) Guidewire looping (arrow) fails to capture the stent. ( d ) The minor papilla is enlarged with a papillotome. ( e ) Balloon dilation of the minor papilla and the stricture at the ventral–dorsal duct junction. ( f ) Forceps grasping the stent at a perpendicular angle. Proximal stent migration poses challenges depending on the location. According to Matsumoto's classification,[ 3​ ] Type D (branch duct embedding) is most difficult. For Type C migration (above a stricture), stricture dilation followed by SpyBite forceps retrieval is recommended, as its serrated jaw provides superior gripping strength. For Type D, SpyGlass-guided side hole grasping is preferred.[ 4​ ] [ ​5​ ] When major papilla access fails due to tortuous anatomy, the minor papilla route with a perpendicular forceps angle should be attempted. Individualized strategies based on anatomical subtype are essential. For Type D migration, pancreatoscopy-guided side hole grasping is the preferred technique. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AR_2AZ Publication History Received: 05 March 2026 Accepted after revision: 02 June 2026 Article published online: 29 June 2026 © 2026. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Endoscopy
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2888-9289
Primary Topic
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Endoscopic management of proximally migrated pancreatic duct stents: A case series of three patients and clinical insights

Yaopeng Zhang, Jieyao Cheng, Xiue Yan, Hong Chang et al.
Endoscopy
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
article

Endoscopic management of proximally migrated pancreatic duct stents: A case series of three patients and clinical insights

Yaopeng Zhang, Jieyao Cheng, Xiue Yan, Hong Chang, W.T. Liu, Yuxing Wang, Yonghui Huang
article en

Abstract

Pancreatic duct stenting is essential for preventing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis and treating ductal strictures.[ 1​ ] Proximal stent migration occurs in 5–6% of cases and may lead to severe complications if not promptly retrieved.[ 2​ ] We present three complex cases successfully managed with endoscopic techniques. Case 1 : A 56-year-old man presented with back pain 2 months after ERCP at another hospital, where a straight pancreatic stent (7Fr) had migrated proximally. Pancreatography revealed the stent embedded in a stricture within the pancreatic head. After bougie dilation (7Fr and 8.5Fr), conventional devices failed. The stent was successfully extracted using SpyBite biopsy forceps ([ Video 1 ]). Video 1 Endoscopic management of proximally migrated pancreatic stents in three challenging cases: SpyBite for the stricture, SpyGlass‑guided side‑hole grasping for the branch duct, and minor papilla approach with a perpendicular angle for grasping. Download Video Case 2 : A 59-year-old man developed pancreatitis due to proximal stent migration 4 weeks after ERCP. Retrieval attempts elsewhere had failed. SpyGlass pancreatoscopy showed the stent lodged in a branch duct. Forceps attempts were unsuccessful due to slipping, and precise grasping of the stent's side hole under direct visualization enabled successful retrieval ([ Video 1 ]). Case 3 : A 33-year-old man with incomplete pancreas divisum underwent pancreatic stenting (5Fr). Within 24 hours, the stent migrated into the pancreatic body. Retrieval via the major papilla failed. After cannulating and dilating the minor papilla, foreign body forceps achieved a perpendicular angle for grasping ( Figs . ​​​​​​​ [ 1and ] [ 2 ]). Fig. 1 Endoscopic management of a patient with incomplete pancreas divisum. ( a ) MRCP revealed a reverse α‑type pancreatic duct with incomplete pancreas divisum. ( b ) X‑ray confirms the same anatomy (arrow). ( c ) Pancreatography shows a tortuous, looped ventral duct with mild dilation, angled confluence with the dorsal duct, and irregular narrowing of the accessory duct. ( d ) The minor papilla orifice is stenotic. ( e ) A needle‑knife is used for minor papilla sphincter pre-cut to establish drainage. ( f ) A pancreatic stent is placed via the major papilla to prevent post‑ERCP pancreatitis. Fig. 2 Endoscopic retrieval of a migrated pancreatic stent via the minor papilla in a patient with incomplete pancreas divisum. ( a ) The migrated stent (arrow) in the pancreatic body. ( b ) Minor papilla cannulation. ( c ) Guidewire looping (arrow) fails to capture the stent. ( d ) The minor papilla is enlarged with a papillotome. ( e ) Balloon dilation of the minor papilla and the stricture at the ventral–dorsal duct junction. ( f ) Forceps grasping the stent at a perpendicular angle. Proximal stent migration poses challenges depending on the location. According to Matsumoto's classification,[ 3​ ] Type D (branch duct embedding) is most difficult. For Type C migration (above a stricture), stricture dilation followed by SpyBite forceps retrieval is recommended, as its serrated jaw provides superior gripping strength. For Type D, SpyGlass-guided side hole grasping is preferred.[ 4​ ] [ ​5​ ] When major papilla access fails due to tortuous anatomy, the minor papilla route with a perpendicular forceps angle should be attempted. Individualized strategies based on anatomical subtype are essential. For Type D migration, pancreatoscopy-guided side hole grasping is the preferred technique. Endoscopy_UCTN_Code_TTT_1AR_2AZ Publication History Received: 05 March 2026 Accepted after revision: 02 June 2026 Article published online: 29 June 2026 © 2026. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Georg Thieme Verlag KG Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Endoscopy
Peking University (CN), Peking University Third Hospital (CN), Beijing Tsinghua Chang Gung Hospital (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.