A Reflective Planner: Using Research Diaries as a Reflexive Method in the Field

This paper examines the gendered challenges faced by planning researchers at the outset of fieldwork, offering a reflexive and holistic analysis of researcher identity, conflicting positionalities, and the politics of representation. Drawing on my fieldwork diary, I critically revisit the research process to disrupt structural gender‑based silences embedded within state‑led planning regimes shaped by socio‑cultural norms and developmental‑state legacies in Taiwan. Through feminist reflexivity, the paper demonstrates how moments of internal tension, ethical dilemma, and embodied discomfort can evolve into sites of critical awareness and methodological growth. In doing so, it highlights reflexivity not only as a methodological tool but also as an ethical practice for challenging hierarchical and gendered power relations within planning research and practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Planning Theory & Practice
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2026.2684982
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Reflective Planner: Using Research Diaries as a Reflexive Method in the Field

Ying-Chun Hou
Planning Theory & Practice
Urban Planning and Governance
article

A Reflective Planner: Using Research Diaries as a Reflexive Method in the Field

Ying-Chun Hou
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the gendered challenges faced by planning researchers at the outset of fieldwork, offering a reflexive and holistic analysis of researcher identity, conflicting positionalities, and the politics of representation. Drawing on my fieldwork diary, I critically revisit the research process to disrupt structural gender‑based silences embedded within state‑led planning regimes shaped by socio‑cultural norms and developmental‑state legacies in Taiwan. Through feminist reflexivity, the paper demonstrates how moments of internal tension, ethical dilemma, and embodied discomfort can evolve into sites of critical awareness and methodological growth. In doing so, it highlights reflexivity not only as a methodological tool but also as an ethical practice for challenging hierarchical and gendered power relations within planning research and practice.

Planning Theory & Practice
Cardiff University (GB)
Economic and Social Research Council
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Reflective Planner: Using Research Diaries as a Reflexive Method in the Field — Ying-Chun Hou · Planning Theory & Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS