Synthetic Panic: Effect of AI-Driven Synchronization on Financial Fragility

Can AI-driven amplification of belief synchronization produce coordination failures in financial markets whose fundamentals are sound? This paper develops a formal framework combining a reduced-form Kuramoto model with a Morris–Shin coordination game. The belief layer specifies two channels of AI influence: directional content forcing, which pulls sentiment toward a speci- fied narrative phase, and coupling amplification, which strengthens peer-to-peer interaction rates without imposing a narrative direction. The model identifies a synthetic-panic region in which AI-driven belief synchronization causes market failure even when fundamentals are sound. Be- cause retail and institutional investors respond differently to synchronized sentiment, retail selling can endogenously erode fundamentals until institutional investors rationally capitulate, produc- ing a two-stage cascade. The two-channel specification also implies that adversaries can rely less on visible directional content when markets are most fragile. The framework generates testable predictions linking volatility, synchronized sentiment, retail flows, and institutional exit.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Open Science Framework
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/ba9fg
Primary Topic
Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Synthetic Panic: Effect of AI-Driven Synchronization on Financial Fragility

Jun Gyung Geun Rey
Open Science Framework
Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
preprint

Synthetic Panic: Effect of AI-Driven Synchronization on Financial Fragility

Jun Gyung Geun Rey
preprint en

Abstract

Can AI-driven amplification of belief synchronization produce coordination failures in financial markets whose fundamentals are sound? This paper develops a formal framework combining a reduced-form Kuramoto model with a Morris–Shin coordination game. The belief layer specifies two channels of AI influence: directional content forcing, which pulls sentiment toward a speci- fied narrative phase, and coupling amplification, which strengthens peer-to-peer interaction rates without imposing a narrative direction. The model identifies a synthetic-panic region in which AI-driven belief synchronization causes market failure even when fundamentals are sound. Be- cause retail and institutional investors respond differently to synchronized sentiment, retail selling can endogenously erode fundamentals until institutional investors rationally capitulate, produc- ing a two-stage cascade. The two-channel specification also implies that adversaries can rely less on visible directional content when markets are most fragile. The framework generates testable predictions linking volatility, synchronized sentiment, retail flows, and institutional exit.

Open Science Framework
Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Synthetic Panic: Effect of AI-Driven Synchronization on Financial Fragility — Jun Gyung Geun Rey · Open Science Framework (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS