Subjective Inequity Aversion: How Perceived Unfair Inequality Affects Subjective Well-being

Abstract Combining theoretical insights from social justice literature and social comparison research, this paper argues that subjective perceptions of inequity (i.e., unfairness), rather than objective deviations from equality, are key to understanding the relationship between (in)equality and subjective well-being. To test this hypothesis, we analyze the association between respondents’ perceived fairness of own, top, and bottom incomes with subjective well-being using data from the European Social Survey 2018. Results from spline regressions indicate that perceived injustice of own and top incomes is negatively related to subjective well-being even when accounting for individuals’ relative income positions and objective macro-level inequality. However, we find no substantive relationship between perceived unfairness of bottom incomes and subjective well-being. These findings are consistent across several robustness checks and when using German panel data to test the effect of own income fairness on subjective well-being in a longitudinal setting. Overall, our results underscore the importance of integrating theoretical insights emphasizing normative and comparative social mechanisms as our results suggest that injustice for oneself hurts more than injustice for others and individuals experience greater discomfort when they believe the rich have too much than when they think the poor have too little.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Happiness Studies
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-026-01053-z
Primary Topic
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subjective Inequity Aversion: How Perceived Unfair Inequality Affects Subjective Well-being

Sandra Bohmann, Fabian Kalleitner
Journal of Happiness Studies
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
article

Subjective Inequity Aversion: How Perceived Unfair Inequality Affects Subjective Well-being

Sandra Bohmann, Fabian Kalleitner
article en

Abstract

Abstract Combining theoretical insights from social justice literature and social comparison research, this paper argues that subjective perceptions of inequity (i.e., unfairness), rather than objective deviations from equality, are key to understanding the relationship between (in)equality and subjective well-being. To test this hypothesis, we analyze the association between respondents’ perceived fairness of own, top, and bottom incomes with subjective well-being using data from the European Social Survey 2018. Results from spline regressions indicate that perceived injustice of own and top incomes is negatively related to subjective well-being even when accounting for individuals’ relative income positions and objective macro-level inequality. However, we find no substantive relationship between perceived unfairness of bottom incomes and subjective well-being. These findings are consistent across several robustness checks and when using German panel data to test the effect of own income fairness on subjective well-being in a longitudinal setting. Overall, our results underscore the importance of integrating theoretical insights emphasizing normative and comparative social mechanisms as our results suggest that injustice for oneself hurts more than injustice for others and individuals experience greater discomfort when they believe the rich have too much than when they think the poor have too little.

Journal of Happiness StudiesVol. 27(6)
LMU Klinikum (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.