Accounting for culinary practices to improve FFQ-based vitamin C estimates in epidemiological studies: a cross-sectional analysis

PURPOSE: Conventional vitamin C intake estimations via food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) typically ignore cooking techniques, which can significantly alter nutrient content. This study evaluates the effect of incorporating a home cooking frequency questionnaire (HCFQ) alongside a FFQ to calculate vitamin C intake and its impact on adherence to dietary recommendations. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis in the PREDIMAR study, a randomized trial that aims to evaluate the effect of a Mediterranean diet supplemented with extra virgin olive oil on atrial fibrillation recurrence after ablation. Vitamin C intake was estimated in two ways: derived from (1) raw food using a FFQ and the Spanish food composition tables, and (2) from raw and cooked food using a FFQ+HCFQ. Adherence to estimated average requirements and a recommended intake of 200 mg/day were used to assess nutritional adequacy. Paired t-Test compared vitamin C mean intakes derived from both methods, and paired McNemar tests assessed differences in adequacy rates. RESULTS: Among 447 patients (25.1% female; mean age = 59.7 years (10.1)), mean vitamin C intake (SD) was significantly higher when derived solely from the FFQ (173.7 mg/day (71.2)) vs. FFQ+HCFQ (160.1 mg/day (68.8); p < 0.001). The largest decreases of vitamin C, when cooking techniques were considered, were observed in legumes (- 88.0%), tubers (- 62.7%), and vegetables (- 12.5%). The main source of between-person variability in vitamin C intake from vegetables and tubers was raw vegetables and boiled potatoes, respectively. Adequacy of vitamin C intake significantly dropped using FFQ+HCFQ (21.5%) vs. FFQ alone (30.4%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ignoring cooking methods may lead to overestimation by approximately 8% of both vitamin C intake and adequacy prevalence in epidemiologic research. Incorporating a cooking-frequency questionnaire yields more conservative and potentially accurate estimates, improving nutritional epidemiology precision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Nutrition
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00394-026-04026-3
Primary Topic
Nutritional Studies and Diet
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accounting for culinary practices to improve FFQ-based vitamin C estimates in epidemiological studies: a cross-sectional analysis

Miguel Ruiz‐Canela, Eduardo Castellanos, María Soledad Hershey, Leticia Goñi et al.
European Journal of Nutrition
Nutritional Studies and Diet
article

Accounting for culinary practices to improve FFQ-based vitamin C estimates in epidemiological studies: a cross-sectional analysis

Miguel Ruiz‐Canela, Eduardo Castellanos, María Soledad Hershey, Leticia Goñi, Luís Tercedor, J. Almendral, Rosa Macías-Ruiz, Alicia Ibáñez Criado, José Luis Ibáñez Criado, Victor De la O, I Garcia-Bolao, Lucía Belzunce, Pablo Ramos, M. Teresa Barrio-López
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: Conventional vitamin C intake estimations via food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) typically ignore cooking techniques, which can significantly alter nutrient content. This study evaluates the effect of incorporating a home cooking frequency questionnaire (HCFQ) alongside a FFQ to calculate vitamin C intake and its impact on adherence to dietary recommendations. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis in the PREDIMAR study, a randomized trial that aims to evaluate the effect of a Mediterranean diet supplemented with extra virgin olive oil on atrial fibrillation recurrence after ablation. Vitamin C intake was estimated in two ways: derived from (1) raw food using a FFQ and the Spanish food composition tables, and (2) from raw and cooked food using a FFQ+HCFQ. Adherence to estimated average requirements and a recommended intake of 200 mg/day were used to assess nutritional adequacy. Paired t-Test compared vitamin C mean intakes derived from both methods, and paired McNemar tests assessed differences in adequacy rates. RESULTS: Among 447 patients (25.1% female; mean age = 59.7 years (10.1)), mean vitamin C intake (SD) was significantly higher when derived solely from the FFQ (173.7 mg/day (71.2)) vs. FFQ+HCFQ (160.1 mg/day (68.8); p < 0.001). The largest decreases of vitamin C, when cooking techniques were considered, were observed in legumes (- 88.0%), tubers (- 62.7%), and vegetables (- 12.5%). The main source of between-person variability in vitamin C intake from vegetables and tubers was raw vegetables and boiled potatoes, respectively. Adequacy of vitamin C intake significantly dropped using FFQ+HCFQ (21.5%) vs. FFQ alone (30.4%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ignoring cooking methods may lead to overestimation by approximately 8% of both vitamin C intake and adequacy prevalence in epidemiologic research. Incorporating a cooking-frequency questionnaire yields more conservative and potentially accurate estimates, improving nutritional epidemiology precision.

European Journal of NutritionVol. 65(5)
Harvard University (US), Universidad de La Rioja (ES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ES), Instituto de Salud Pública de Navarra (ES), Quantitative BioSciences (US), Navarre Institute of Health Research (ES), Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada (ES), Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves (ES), Universidad Internacional De La Rioja (ES), HM Hospitales (ES), National Research Council (LK), Clinica Universidad de Navarra (ES), Hospital General Universitario de Alicante Doctor Balmis (ES), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (ES), Universidad de Navarra (ES)
Universidad de Navarra
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Nutritional Studies and Diet
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.