Digital assessment of banana (Musa spp.) genotype resistance to banana weevil (Cosmopolites sordidus) compared with expert visual assessment

Accurately assessing weevil damage is critical when evaluating banana germplasm. This enables identification of genotypes resistant to the banana weevil, Cosmopolites sordidus, for use as elite parents or for advancement in banana breeding programs. Although visual observation remains the most common phenotyping approach, it is limited by individual bias. This study investigated the potential of image analyses as precise and objective alternatives for assessing weevil damage on the banana corm. ImageJ and four machine learning models, to include YOLO_v11 medium, U-Net 512, SegFormer, and MiT-b0, were explored. 260, 65, and 72 images were used to train, test, and validate the machine learning models, respectively. Phenotyping trials were set up as partially replicated (P-rep) designs with 18 test genotypes and four control genotypes. All plants were produced through tissue culture, raised in pots before infestation with the weevils. At termination, the percentage score of each of the 370 corm samples was evaluated both visually and by image analysis to compare scores across all methods. A significant genotype effect was detected, indicating differences among genotypes in resistance to banana weevils. Furthermore, a significant genotype-by-scoring-method interaction showed that genotype rankings in terms of resistance to banana weevils varied across methods. This emphasized that the choice of scoring approach can affect the magnitude of damage quantified. Visual observation agreed more closely with image analyses for smaller scores and less for larger scores. Results from genotype performance evaluation showed that machine learning methods, except for the YOLO_v11, have a strong level of agreement and can be used interchangeably, giving consistent, reliable, and repeatable measurements. We recommend and have adopted machine learning when scoring weevil damage in the banana corm to avoid individual bias and subjectivity arising from visual observation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0352433
Primary Topic
Banana Cultivation and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Digital assessment of banana (Musa spp.) genotype resistance to banana weevil (Cosmopolites sordidus) compared with expert visual assessment

Gloria Valentine Nakato, Gerald Mwanje, Jeremy Tusubira, Trushar Shah et al.
PLoS ONE
Banana Cultivation and Research
article

Digital assessment of banana (Musa spp.) genotype resistance to banana weevil (Cosmopolites sordidus) compared with expert visual assessment

Gloria Valentine Nakato, Gerald Mwanje, Jeremy Tusubira, Trushar Shah, Charles Serebe, Joyce Nakatumba-Nabende, Allan Brown, Rony Swennen, Reagan Kanaabi
article en

Abstract

Accurately assessing weevil damage is critical when evaluating banana germplasm. This enables identification of genotypes resistant to the banana weevil, Cosmopolites sordidus, for use as elite parents or for advancement in banana breeding programs. Although visual observation remains the most common phenotyping approach, it is limited by individual bias. This study investigated the potential of image analyses as precise and objective alternatives for assessing weevil damage on the banana corm. ImageJ and four machine learning models, to include YOLO_v11 medium, U-Net 512, SegFormer, and MiT-b0, were explored. 260, 65, and 72 images were used to train, test, and validate the machine learning models, respectively. Phenotyping trials were set up as partially replicated (P-rep) designs with 18 test genotypes and four control genotypes. All plants were produced through tissue culture, raised in pots before infestation with the weevils. At termination, the percentage score of each of the 370 corm samples was evaluated both visually and by image analysis to compare scores across all methods. A significant genotype effect was detected, indicating differences among genotypes in resistance to banana weevils. Furthermore, a significant genotype-by-scoring-method interaction showed that genotype rankings in terms of resistance to banana weevils varied across methods. This emphasized that the choice of scoring approach can affect the magnitude of damage quantified. Visual observation agreed more closely with image analyses for smaller scores and less for larger scores. Results from genotype performance evaluation showed that machine learning methods, except for the YOLO_v11, have a strong level of agreement and can be used interchangeably, giving consistent, reliable, and repeatable measurements. We recommend and have adopted machine learning when scoring weevil damage in the banana corm to avoid individual bias and subjectivity arising from visual observation.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(6)
International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (TZ), International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (UG), International Institute of Tropical Agriculture (KE), Makerere University (UG), KU Leuven (BE)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Banana Cultivation and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.