Methodological framework for forecasting directive changes in project calendar models

This article develops a methodological framework for forecasting directive changes in schedule models of investment and construction projects. Directive changes are understood as mandatory managerial interventions initiated by the client and implemented outside formalized change management procedures. Such interventions are considered as an independent object of analysis exerting a systemic influence on the stability and dynamics of project schedule-network models. The study is based on the integration of a directive change classifier and index-based characteristics of the directive flow with a system of consequence indicators intended for the quantitative assessment of the schedule effects caused by directive interventions. The XGBoost algorithm is proposed as the core forecasting instrument due to its ability to identify nonlinear relationships between directive parameters and the response of the project scheduling system. Interpretation of the forecasting results is supported through SHAP analysis, enabling a quantitative assessment of the contribution of each classifier feature to the generated forecast. The proposed methodological framework includes sequential stages of directive formalization, feature encoding, model training, interpretation of results, and scenario-based integration of forecasts into project schedule models. The article also substantiates the possibility of digital integration of forecasting results into PMIS, MS Project, and 4D BIM environments, thereby increasing the transparency of schedule models and expanding the analytical capabilities of scenario-based assessment of directive changes in investment and construction projects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Construction and Architecture
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29039/2308-0191-2026-14-2-c0036
Primary Topic
Information Systems and Technology Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Methodological framework for forecasting directive changes in project calendar models

Azariy Lapidus, Miguel De La Torre Ibanez
Construction and Architecture
Information Systems and Technology Applications
article

Methodological framework for forecasting directive changes in project calendar models

Azariy Lapidus, Miguel De La Torre Ibanez
article en

Abstract

This article develops a methodological framework for forecasting directive changes in schedule models of investment and construction projects. Directive changes are understood as mandatory managerial interventions initiated by the client and implemented outside formalized change management procedures. Such interventions are considered as an independent object of analysis exerting a systemic influence on the stability and dynamics of project schedule-network models. The study is based on the integration of a directive change classifier and index-based characteristics of the directive flow with a system of consequence indicators intended for the quantitative assessment of the schedule effects caused by directive interventions. The XGBoost algorithm is proposed as the core forecasting instrument due to its ability to identify nonlinear relationships between directive parameters and the response of the project scheduling system. Interpretation of the forecasting results is supported through SHAP analysis, enabling a quantitative assessment of the contribution of each classifier feature to the generated forecast. The proposed methodological framework includes sequential stages of directive formalization, feature encoding, model training, interpretation of results, and scenario-based integration of forecasts into project schedule models. The article also substantiates the possibility of digital integration of forecasting results into PMIS, MS Project, and 4D BIM environments, thereby increasing the transparency of schedule models and expanding the analytical capabilities of scenario-based assessment of directive changes in investment and construction projects.

Construction and ArchitectureVol. 14(2)
Moscow State University of Civil Engineering (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Information Systems and Technology Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.