Exploring real-world lumbar posture behaviour. A whole day comparison of individuals with low back pain and healthy controls

Background Previous research of lumbar posture on individuals with low back pain (LBP) has produced conflicting findings compared to control groups. This research has been limited by environmental or task constraints. Real-world postural behaviour across an entire day remains poorly understood. This study examined whole-day lumbar posture characteristics in people with and without LBP using wearable sensors. Methods 13 people with LBP and 11 healthy controls volunteered for this study. A three-accelerometer setup was used to measure real-world lumbar posture classifying sitting and standing. Data were normalised to individual maximum ranges. Differences in measures of mean posture, variability, fidgeting, and posture-use frequency distributions, were derived. Findings An average of 350 min of data per person was available for analysis. Overall, between group differences were small. LBP demonstrated more flexed posture use in standing and a more flexed sitting frequency distribution. Interpretation Real-world posture behaviour was similar between individuals with and without LBP. Where differences were determined they related to temporal components such as frequencies which are masked with traditional postural estimates. These findings suggest that posture-pain relationships may vary substantially between individuals, emphasising the need for person-specific analysis in future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Biomechanics
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2026.106908
Primary Topic
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring real-world lumbar posture behaviour. A whole day comparison of individuals with low back pain and healthy controls

Jonathan M. Williams, F. A. McClintock, Andrew Callaway, Elena Muñoz-Gómez et al.
Clinical Biomechanics
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
article

Exploring real-world lumbar posture behaviour. A whole day comparison of individuals with low back pain and healthy controls

Jonathan M. Williams, F. A. McClintock, Andrew Callaway, Elena Muñoz-Gómez, Raee S. Alqhtani, Carol J. Clark
article en

Abstract

Background Previous research of lumbar posture on individuals with low back pain (LBP) has produced conflicting findings compared to control groups. This research has been limited by environmental or task constraints. Real-world postural behaviour across an entire day remains poorly understood. This study examined whole-day lumbar posture characteristics in people with and without LBP using wearable sensors. Methods 13 people with LBP and 11 healthy controls volunteered for this study. A three-accelerometer setup was used to measure real-world lumbar posture classifying sitting and standing. Data were normalised to individual maximum ranges. Differences in measures of mean posture, variability, fidgeting, and posture-use frequency distributions, were derived. Findings An average of 350 min of data per person was available for analysis. Overall, between group differences were small. LBP demonstrated more flexed posture use in standing and a more flexed sitting frequency distribution. Interpretation Real-world posture behaviour was similar between individuals with and without LBP. Where differences were determined they related to temporal components such as frequencies which are masked with traditional postural estimates. These findings suggest that posture-pain relationships may vary substantially between individuals, emphasising the need for person-specific analysis in future research.

Clinical BiomechanicsVol. 138
Universitat de València (ES), Biomechanics Institute of Valencia (ES), Najran University (SA), Bournemouth University (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.