Incidental Malignancies in the Emergency Department: Missed Diagnoses, Radiological Difficulty, and a Risk-Based Framework for Follow-Up

Background: Incidental malignancies on emergency department (ED) CT may go unrecognized, risking delayed diagnosis. We investigated their prevalence, recognition rate, and follow-up risk stratification. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 15,347 CT reports from a tertiary ED (April 2016–March 2019). To determine whether missed diagnoses reflected inherent radiological difficulty or situational factors, ten board-certified emergency physicians completed a standardized 18-case interpretation test under off-duty conditions. Results: Incidental malignancies were identified in 25 patients (0.16%); lung carcinoma was most common (28%). Of 25 patients, 16 (64%) had malignancy recognized at the initial ED visit; 9 (36%) were missed. One discharged new patient without scheduled follow-up represented the highest-risk group for loss to follow-up. Diagnostic accuracy ranged from 0/10 to 9/10 (Cochran’s Q test, p < 0.001). Cases 1, 4, and 7 were unidentified by all evaluators (p = 0.002 vs. Case 16, McNemar test with Bonferroni correction). No significant inter-physician difference was observed (p = 0.73, Friedman test). Conclusions: Incidental malignancies occurred in 0.16% of ED CT examinations, with 36% missed at initial presentation. Missed diagnoses reflected inherent radiological difficulty and systemic factors rather than individual expertise. Discharged new patients without scheduled follow-up represent the highest-risk group, underscoring the need for systems-based interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15135071
Primary Topic
Radiology practices and education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incidental Malignancies in the Emergency Department: Missed Diagnoses, Radiological Difficulty, and a Risk-Based Framework for Follow-Up

Yuki Kaki, Kenji Dohi, Nobuyuki Takeyama, Hiroki Yamaga et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Radiology practices and education
article

Incidental Malignancies in the Emergency Department: Missed Diagnoses, Radiological Difficulty, and a Risk-Based Framework for Follow-Up

Yuki Kaki, Kenji Dohi, Nobuyuki Takeyama, Hiroki Yamaga, Hiromi Takayasu, Atsuo Maeda, Kazuyuki Miyamoto, Jun Sasaki, Mako Kitazono, Ayako Iijima
article en

Abstract

Background: Incidental malignancies on emergency department (ED) CT may go unrecognized, risking delayed diagnosis. We investigated their prevalence, recognition rate, and follow-up risk stratification. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 15,347 CT reports from a tertiary ED (April 2016–March 2019). To determine whether missed diagnoses reflected inherent radiological difficulty or situational factors, ten board-certified emergency physicians completed a standardized 18-case interpretation test under off-duty conditions. Results: Incidental malignancies were identified in 25 patients (0.16%); lung carcinoma was most common (28%). Of 25 patients, 16 (64%) had malignancy recognized at the initial ED visit; 9 (36%) were missed. One discharged new patient without scheduled follow-up represented the highest-risk group for loss to follow-up. Diagnostic accuracy ranged from 0/10 to 9/10 (Cochran’s Q test, p < 0.001). Cases 1, 4, and 7 were unidentified by all evaluators (p = 0.002 vs. Case 16, McNemar test with Bonferroni correction). No significant inter-physician difference was observed (p = 0.73, Friedman test). Conclusions: Incidental malignancies occurred in 0.16% of ED CT examinations, with 36% missed at initial presentation. Missed diagnoses reflected inherent radiological difficulty and systemic factors rather than individual expertise. Discharged new patients without scheduled follow-up represent the highest-risk group, underscoring the need for systems-based interventions.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(13)
SHOWA Medical University (JP), Koto Hospital (JP), SHOWA Medical University Fujigaoka Hospital (JP), JR Tokyo General Hospital (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Radiology practices and education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.