Test boredom while working on difficult versus easy tasks: The same emotion but different effects on performance.

The focus of this work was on test boredom experienced while working on difficult versus easy tasks.In Study 1 (N 5 208 eighth graders), we investigated the structural validity of test boredom while working on difficult tasks (i.e., overchallenge boredom) versus easy tasks (i.e., underchallenge boredom).Supporting our hypotheses, the Test Boredom Scale-State demonstrated scalar invariance across both situations, with weakto-moderate correlations of boredom between the two situations.Also consistent with our hypotheses, a prototypical single boredom item from the Test Boredom Scale-State showed measurement invariance but weak correlations across situations.These findings suggest that test boredom represents the same emotion in both situations and can be validly assessed with a single item.Based on these findings, in Study 2 (N 5 132 university students), we used this item to test the hypothesis that test boredom reduces cognitive resources and performance when working on difficult tasks but not when working on easy tasks (i.e., the abundance hypothesis).We used an experimental within-person design in which participants worked on both difficult and easy digit span memory tasks.As expected, the results indicated that boredom experienced during difficult tasks negatively affected performance by reducing cognitive resources (measured via reaction time), a consequence of processing boredom.In contrast, boredom experienced during easy tasks had no negative impact on performance, likely because cognitive resources remained abundant even when processing boredom.Implications for future research and practice are discussed. Educational Impact and Implications StatementOur research indicates that boredom that arises from working on difficult tasks versus easy tasks represents the same emotion.However, distinguishing between the experiences of boredom in these differing situations is crucial for understanding their effects.Unlike boredom experienced while working on easy tasks (i.e., underchallenge boredom), boredom when working on difficult tasks (i.e., overchallenge boredom) impairs performance by depleting cognitive resources.Thus, although boredom as an unpleasant emotional state is generally undesirable, educators should recognize that boredom caused by working on difficult tasks is particularly detrimental.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2026-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0001045
Primary Topic
Mind wandering and attention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Test boredom while working on difficult versus easy tasks: The same emotion but different effects on performance.

Reinhard Pekrun, Lisa Stempfer, Sarah E. M. Stoll, Anne C. Frenzel et al.
Journal of Educational Psychology
Mind wandering and attention
article

Test boredom while working on difficult versus easy tasks: The same emotion but different effects on performance.

Reinhard Pekrun, Lisa Stempfer, Sarah E. M. Stoll, Anne C. Frenzel, Jonathan Fries, Maik Bieleke, Takuya Yanagida, Thomas Goetz, Lukas Kraiger, Caroline A. Adam
article en

Abstract

The focus of this work was on test boredom experienced while working on difficult versus easy tasks.In Study 1 (N 5 208 eighth graders), we investigated the structural validity of test boredom while working on difficult tasks (i.e., overchallenge boredom) versus easy tasks (i.e., underchallenge boredom).Supporting our hypotheses, the Test Boredom Scale-State demonstrated scalar invariance across both situations, with weakto-moderate correlations of boredom between the two situations.Also consistent with our hypotheses, a prototypical single boredom item from the Test Boredom Scale-State showed measurement invariance but weak correlations across situations.These findings suggest that test boredom represents the same emotion in both situations and can be validly assessed with a single item.Based on these findings, in Study 2 (N 5 132 university students), we used this item to test the hypothesis that test boredom reduces cognitive resources and performance when working on difficult tasks but not when working on easy tasks (i.e., the abundance hypothesis).We used an experimental within-person design in which participants worked on both difficult and easy digit span memory tasks.As expected, the results indicated that boredom experienced during difficult tasks negatively affected performance by reducing cognitive resources (measured via reaction time), a consequence of processing boredom.In contrast, boredom experienced during easy tasks had no negative impact on performance, likely because cognitive resources remained abundant even when processing boredom.Implications for future research and practice are discussed. Educational Impact and Implications StatementOur research indicates that boredom that arises from working on difficult tasks versus easy tasks represents the same emotion.However, distinguishing between the experiences of boredom in these differing situations is crucial for understanding their effects.Unlike boredom experienced while working on easy tasks (i.e., underchallenge boredom), boredom when working on difficult tasks (i.e., overchallenge boredom) impairs performance by depleting cognitive resources.Thus, although boredom as an unpleasant emotional state is generally undesirable, educators should recognize that boredom caused by working on difficult tasks is particularly detrimental.

Journal of Educational Psychology
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Mind wandering and attention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.